Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs Mobile |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 980 Ti vs 980 Mobile among all GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 7.7 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 TiGPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Better PassMark score | 11,318 | vs | 9,579 | Around 20% better PassMark score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher pixel rate | 96 GPixel/s | vs | 68.1 GPixel/s | More than 40% higher pixel rate | |||
| Significantly more render output processors | 96 | vs | 64 | 32 more render output processors | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 5,632 GFLOPS | vs | 4,358 GFLOPS | Around 30% better floating-point performance | |||
| Higher texture rate | 176 GTexel/s | vs | 136.2 GTexel/s | Around 30% higher texture rate | |||
| More shading units | 2,816 | vs | 2,048 | 768 more shading units | |||
| More texture mapping units | 176 | vs | 128 | 48 more texture mapping units | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 6,435 | vs | 5,133 | More than 25% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| Higher bioshock infinite framerate | 133.5 | vs | 116.35 | Around 15% higher bioshock infinite framerate | |||
| Slightly better cloud gate factor score | 23.42 | vs | 22.51 | Around 5% better cloud gate factor score | |||
| |||||||
| More memory | 8,192 MB | vs | 6,144 MB | Around 35% more memory | |||
| Slightly higher clock speed | 1,064 MHz | vs | 1,000 MHz | More than 5% higher clock speed | |||
| Better manhattan score | 8,916.13 | vs | 3,718.52 | Around 2.5x better manhattan score | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 1,216 MHz | vs | 1,076 MHz | Around 15% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Lower TDP | 165W | vs | 250W | Around 35% lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
