Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 980
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 based on its .
See full details GeForce GTX 980 vs 1050 Ti |
Released September, 2014
Nvidia GeForce GTX 980
- 1.1 GHz
- 4 GB GDDR5
8.4 Out of 10
by techPowerUp!The ROP count is interesting as it has doubled over the GK104 and is greater than the 48 on the GM110.
VS
Released October, 2016
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
- 1.3 GHz
- 4 GB GDDR5
7 Out of 10
by www.tweaktown.com (Oct, 2016)NVIDIA's impressive Pascal architecture has some nice tricks under its 16nm FinFET hood, but the Twin Frozr VI cooler is 40% quieter than its predecessor (the Twin Frozr V), and it also keeps the card 20% cooler.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 980 vs 1050 Ti among all GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 8.4 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 224.4 GB/s | vs | 112.1 GB/s | More than 2x higher memory bandwidth | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Better floating-point performance | 4,981 GFLOPS | vs | 1,983 GFLOPS | More than 2.5x better floating-point performance | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 77.82 GPixel/s | vs | 41.3 GPixel/s | Around 90% higher pixel rate | |||
| Higher texture rate | 155.6 GTexel/s | vs | 62 GTexel/s | More than 2.5x higher texture rate | |||
| Significantly more render output processors | 64 | vs | 32 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
| Significantly more shading units | 2,048 | vs | 768 | 1280 more shading units | |||
| Significantly more texture mapping units | 128 | vs | 48 | 80 more texture mapping units | |||
| Significantly better fire strike factor score | 76.57 | vs | 51.07 | Around 50% better fire strike factor score | |||
| Higher battlefield 4 framerate | 93.4 | vs | 66 | More than 40% higher battlefield 4 framerate | |||
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 1,291 MHz | vs | 1,127 MHz | Around 15% higher clock speed | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 1,392 MHz | vs | 1,216 MHz | Around 15% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Significantly lower TDP | 75W | vs | 165W | 2.2x lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 980 vs 1050 Ti
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Battlefield 4
Bioshock Infinite
Crysis 3
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $289 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| 1050 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| 960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| RX 560 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| 750 Ti vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| $289 | ||
| 1060 vs 980 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS | |
| MX150 vs 1050 | ||
| | VS | |
| $289 | ||
| 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
 | VS | |
| $289 | ||
| RX 580 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| $289 | ||
| 1060 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 1050 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 2 comments.
