GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 980M vs 1050 among all GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

7.4

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 980M 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 980M  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 980M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 980M

Report a correction
Significantly more memory 8,192 MB vs 2,048 MB 4x more memory
Better PassMark score 5,683 vs 4,598 Around 25% better PassMark score
Higher memory bandwidth 160.4 GB/s vs 112.1 GB/s Around 45% higher memory bandwidth
Better floating-point performance 3,189 GFLOPS vs 1,733.1 GFLOPS Around 85% better floating-point performance
Higher pixel rate 66.4 GPixel/s vs 43.3 GPixel/s Around 55% higher pixel rate
Significantly more render output processors 64 vs 32 Twice as many render output processors
Higher texture rate 99.6 GTexel/s vs 54.2 GTexel/s Around 85% higher texture rate
Significantly better fire strike factor score 70.06 vs 41.2 More than 70% better fire strike factor score
More shading units 1,536 vs 640 896 more shading units
More texture mapping units 96 vs 40 56 more texture mapping units
Higher battlefield 4 framerate 71.7 vs 54 Around 35% higher battlefield 4 framerate
Slightly better PassMark direct compute score 3,461 vs 2,907 Around 20% better PassMark direct compute score
Front view of GeForce GTX 1050

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1,354 MHz vs 1,038 MHz More than 30% higher clock speed
Higher effective memory clock speed 7,008 MHz vs 5,012 MHz Around 40% higher effective memory clock speed
Significantly better video composition score 76.12 frames/s vs 18.47 frames/s More than 4x better video composition score
Higher turbo clock speed 1,455 MHz vs 1,127 MHz Around 30% higher turbo clock speed
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,752 MHz vs 1,253 MHz Around 40% higher memory clock speed

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 980M vs 1050

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 980M
383.63 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 1050
279.38 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 980M
93.65 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 1050
80.3 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Battlefield 4

Bioshock Infinite

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus