Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 980M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 980M

Report a correction
Significantly better 3DMark 11 graphics score 26,811 vs 14,020 More than 90% better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Significantly more memory 8,192 MB vs 3,072 MB Around 2.8x more memory
Higher clock speed 1,038 MHz vs 863 MHz More than 20% higher clock speed
Higher pixel rate 66.4 GPixel/s vs 41.4 GPixel/s More than 60% higher pixel rate
Higher turbo clock speed 1,127 MHz vs 902 MHz Around 25% higher turbo clock speed
More render output processors 64 vs 48 16 more render output processors
Slightly higher FarCry 3 framerate 51.55 vs 46 More than 10% higher FarCry 3 framerate
Front view of GeForce GTX 780

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 35,080 vs 12,562 More than 2.8x better 3DMark06 score
Better PassMark score 7,976 vs 5,711 Around 40% better PassMark score
Significantly higher memory bandwidth 288.4 GB/s vs 160.4 GB/s Around 80% higher memory bandwidth
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 42,870 vs 34,695 Around 25% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Significantly more texture mapping units 192 vs 96 Twice as many texture mapping units
Higher texture rate 165.7 GTexel/s vs 99.6 GTexel/s More than 65% higher texture rate
Higher effective memory clock speed 6,008 MHz vs 5,012 MHz Around 20% higher effective memory clock speed
Slightly better floating-point performance 3,977 GFLOPS vs 3,189 GFLOPS Around 25% better floating-point performance
More shading units 2,304 vs 1,536 768 more shading units
Higher memory clock speed 1,502 MHz vs 1,253 MHz Around 20% higher memory clock speed
Slightly better particle simulation score 966.29 mInteraction/s vs 866.36 mInteraction/s More than 10% better particle simulation score
Better PassMark direct compute score 3,971 vs 3,460 Around 15% better PassMark direct compute score

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 980M vs 780

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 980M
384.62 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 780
255.31 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 980M
92.63 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 780
57.69 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 980M
1,146.53 frames/s
GeForce GTX 780
1,928.62 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 980M
866.36 mInteraction/s
GeForce GTX 780
966.29 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 980M
7.31 frames/s
GeForce GTX 780
5.49 frames/s

Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 980M
89.43 frames/s
GeForce GTX 780
91.16 frames/s

Battlefield 4

FarCry 3

Read more

Comments

Showing 1 comment.
I have the 980m. Feels good to see how close it is with the 780.
comments powered by Disqus