Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details GeForce GTX TITAN X vs 1080 Ti |
Released March, 2015
Nvidia GeForce GTX TITAN X
- 1 GHz
- 12 GB GDDR5
7.5 Out of 10
by techPowerUp!The controller is ready for 5K (5120x2880, four times the pixels as QuadHD); the 384-bit wide memory interface holds 12 GB of memory.
VS
Released March, 2017
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
- 1.5 GHz
- 11 GB GDDR5
9.7 Out of 10
by www.tweaktown.com (Apr, 2017)For those with a 21:9 aspect display and native 3440x1440 resolution, in our testing the AORUS GTX 1080 Ti 11G can handle 80-100FPS without a problem, which is perfect for the 100Hz UltraWide gaming monitors on the market.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of TITAN X vs 1080 Ti among all GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 9.7 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 TiGPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Slightly more memory | 12,288 MB | vs | 11,264 MB | Around 10% more memory | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,753 MHz | vs | 1,376 MHz | More than 25% higher memory clock speed | |||
| More render output processors | 96 | vs | 88 | 8 more render output processors | |||
| |||||||
| Much better manhattan score | 51,868.33 | vs | 3,718.62 | Around 14x better manhattan score | |||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 1,480 MHz | vs | 1,000 MHz | Around 50% higher clock speed | |||
| Significantly better floating-point performance | 11,340 GFLOPS | vs | 6,144 GFLOPS | Around 85% better floating-point performance | |||
| Better PassMark score | 13,373 | vs | 10,669 | More than 25% better PassMark score | |||
| Significantly higher effective memory clock speed | 11,008 MHz | vs | 7,012 MHz | More than 55% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Significantly higher texture rate | 354.4 GTexel/s | vs | 192 GTexel/s | Around 85% higher texture rate | |||
| Significantly higher pixel rate | 139.2 GPixel/s | vs | 96 GPixel/s | Around 45% higher pixel rate | |||
| Significantly higher turbo clock speed | 1,582 MHz | vs | 1,089 MHz | More than 45% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Much better PassMark direct compute score | 9,513 | vs | 6,279 | More than 50% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| Better particle simulation score | 1,905.58 mInteraction/s | vs | 1,492.64 mInteraction/s | Around 30% better particle simulation score | |||
| More shading units | 3,584 | vs | 3,072 | 512 more shading units | |||
| More texture mapping units | 224 | vs | 192 | 32 more texture mapping units | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX TITAN X vs 1080 Ti
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench
Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 1050 vs MX150 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $289 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| $289 | ||
| 1060 vs RX 580 | ||
 | VS | |
| $289 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| 960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 6 comments.
