GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of TITAN Z vs 1080 among Desktop GPUs over $400

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080  based on its benchmarks, compute performance and noise and power.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX TITAN Z

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX TITAN Z

Report a correction
Is dual GPU Yes vs No About half of graphics cards are dual GPU
Much higher memory bandwidth 672 GB/s vs 224.4 GB/s Around 3x higher memory bandwidth
Significantly more memory 12,288 MB vs 8,192 MB 50% more memory
Many more texture mapping units 480 vs 160 Three times as many texture mapping units
Much higher texture rate 420.4 GTexel/s vs 257.1 GTexel/s Around 65% higher texture rate
Many more shading units 5,760 vs 2,560 3200 more shading units
Better floating-point performance 10,092 GFLOPS vs 8,228 GFLOPS Around 25% better floating-point performance
Significantly more render output processors 96 vs 64 32 more render output processors
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,750 MHz vs 1,251 MHz Around 40% higher memory clock speed
Wider memory bus 768 bit vs 256 bit 3x wider memory bus
Front view of GeForce GTX 1080

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 1,607 MHz vs 705 MHz More than 2.2x higher clock speed
Significantly better PassMark score 11,994 vs 7,752 Around 55% better PassMark score
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 10,008 MHz vs 7,000 MHz Around 45% higher effective memory clock speed
Much higher turbo clock speed 1,733 MHz vs 876 MHz Around 2x higher turbo clock speed
Significantly better face detection score 147.18 mPixels/s vs 79.68 mPixels/s Around 85% better face detection score
Much better PassMark direct compute score 8,106 vs 3,418 More than 2.2x better PassMark direct compute score
Much higher battlefield 4 framerate 172 vs 76.5 Around 2.2x higher battlefield 4 framerate
Much lower TDP 180W vs 375W 2.1x lower TDP
Better sky diver factor score 516.48 vs 485.55 More than 5% better sky diver factor score

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs 1080

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX TITAN Z
332.46 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 1080
685.15 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX TITAN Z
79.68 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 1080
147.18 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX TITAN Z
1,933.42 frames/s
GeForce GTX 1080
1,721.2 frames/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Comments

comments powered by Disqus