Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti based on its benchmarks, compute performance and noise and power.
See full details GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs 980 Ti |
Released May, 2014
Nvidia GeForce GTX TITAN Z
- 705 MHz
- 12 GB GDDR5
7 Out of 10
by Shawn-Baker (May, 2013)Along with that, you can see we've just got very solid FPS at all resolutions with a strong 81 FPS being seen at 2560 x 1600.
VS
Released June, 2015
Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti
- 1 GHz
- 6 GB GDDR5
9.7 Out of 10
by techPowerUp!MSI's GeForce GTX 980 Ti introduces a new TwinFrozr V cooler variant to the company's GeForce lineup and is heavily overclocked to a base clock of 1178 MHz out of the box; the memory is also overclocked by 25 MHz.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of TITAN Z vs 980 Ti among Desktop GPUs over $400
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 9.7 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 TiGPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Is dual GPU | Yes | vs | No | About half of graphics cards are dual GPU | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much more memory | 12,288 MB | vs | 6,144 MB | 2x more memory | |||
| Much higher texture rate | 420.4 GTexel/s | vs | 176 GTexel/s | Around 2.5x higher texture rate | |||
| Significantly better floating-point performance | 10,092 GFLOPS | vs | 5,632 GFLOPS | Around 80% better floating-point performance | |||
| Many more texture mapping units | 480 | vs | 176 | 304 more texture mapping units | |||
| Many more shading units | 5,760 | vs | 2,816 | 2944 more shading units | |||
| Slightly higher pixel rate | 105.12 GPixel/s | vs | 96 GPixel/s | Around 10% higher pixel rate | |||
| Wider memory bus | 768 bit | vs | 384 bit | 2x wider memory bus | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly better PassMark score | 11,322 | vs | 7,781 | More than 45% better PassMark score | |||
| Higher clock speed | 1,000 MHz | vs | 705 MHz | More than 40% higher clock speed | |||
| Much better T-Rex score | 8,062.99 | vs | 3,358.22 | Around 2.5x better T-Rex score | |||
| Significantly better face detection score | 143.88 mPixels/s | vs | 79.68 mPixels/s | More than 80% better face detection score | |||
| Significantly better PassMark direct compute score | 6,438 | vs | 3,398 | Around 90% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 1,076 MHz | vs | 876 MHz | Around 25% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Significantly higher crysis 3 framerate | 81 | vs | 45 | 80% higher crysis 3 framerate | |||
| Much lower TDP | 250W | vs | 375W | Around 35% lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs 980 Ti
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Battlefield 4
Crysis 3
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
Read more
Comments
Showing 3 comments.
