GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs BLACK |
Released May, 2014
Nvidia GeForce GTX TITAN Z
- 705 MHz
- 12 GB GDDR5
7.1 Out of 10
by www.tweaktown.com (May, 2016)While the higher-end GTX 1080 wins out with brute specs including GDDR5X memory that's clocked at 10GHz, and while the GTX 1070 isn't as beefy as its big brother, it can swing at the same weight and size, beating nearly everything else we tested in most games, except for the GTX 1080.
VS
Released February, 2014
Nvidia GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
- 889 MHz
- 6 GB GDDR5
7.1 Out of 10
by Shawn-Baker (Apr, 2013)We've got some massive gains and just overall some really playable numbers with an 81 FPS minimum being seen at even the highest resolution.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of TITAN Z vs TITAN BLACK among Desktop GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Is dual GPU | Yes | vs | No | About half of graphics cards are dual GPU | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much more memory | 12,288 MB | vs | 6,144 MB | 2x more memory | |||
| Much better floating-point performance | 10,092 GFLOPS | vs | 5,121 GFLOPS | More than 95% better floating-point performance | |||
| Much higher texture rate | 420.4 GTexel/s | vs | 213.4 GTexel/s | More than 95% higher texture rate | |||
| Many more texture mapping units | 480 | vs | 240 | Twice as many texture mapping units | |||
| Many more shading units | 5,760 | vs | 2,880 | Twice as many shading units | |||
| Significantly higher pixel rate | 105.12 GPixel/s | vs | 53.3 GPixel/s | More than 95% higher pixel rate | |||
| Many more render output processors | 96 | vs | 48 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
| Much wider memory bus | 768 bit | vs | 384 bit | 2x wider memory bus | |||
| Better fire strike factor score | 85.37 | vs | 77.05 | More than 10% better fire strike factor score | |||
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 889 MHz | vs | 705 MHz | More than 25% higher clock speed | |||
| Better PassMark score | 8,556 | vs | 7,752 | More than 10% better PassMark score | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 980 MHz | vs | 876 MHz | More than 10% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 4,424 | vs | 3,418 | Around 30% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| Significantly lower TDP | 250W | vs | 375W | Around 35% lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs BLACK
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
Read more
Comments
Showing 3 comments.
