GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of TITAN Z vs TITAN BLACK among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK  based on its benchmarks, compute performance and noise and power.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX TITAN Z

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX TITAN Z

Report a correction
Is dual GPU Yes vs No About half of graphics cards are dual GPU
Much more memory 12,288 MB vs 6,144 MB 2x more memory
Much better floating-point performance 10,092 GFLOPS vs 5,121 GFLOPS More than 95% better floating-point performance
Much higher texture rate 420.4 GTexel/s vs 213.4 GTexel/s More than 95% higher texture rate
Many more texture mapping units 480 vs 240 Twice as many texture mapping units
Significantly higher pixel rate 105.12 GPixel/s vs 53.3 GPixel/s More than 95% higher pixel rate
Many more shading units 5,760 vs 2,880 Twice as many shading units
Many more render output processors 96 vs 48 Twice as many render output processors
Better fire strike factor score 84.89 vs 76.88 More than 10% better fire strike factor score
Wider memory bus 768 bit vs 384 bit 2x wider memory bus
Front view of GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 889 MHz vs 705 MHz More than 25% higher clock speed
Slightly better PassMark score 8,560 vs 7,781 More than 10% better PassMark score
Higher turbo clock speed 980 MHz vs 876 MHz More than 10% higher turbo clock speed
Better PassMark direct compute score 4,421 vs 3,398 More than 30% better PassMark direct compute score
Much lower TDP 250W vs 375W Around 35% lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs BLACK

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX TITAN Z
332.46 mHash/s
GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
303.04 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX TITAN Z
79.68 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
63.71 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX TITAN Z
1,933.42 frames/s
GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
2,062.57 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX TITAN Z
844.6 mInteraction/s
GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
304.92 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Comments

Showing 3 comments.
Titan Z can't use 12 gigs of RAM actually, it's two sets of 6 gigs for each GPU and the information is always identical on both, so you can only store 6 gb of data really.
Not really, They will probably add more benchmarks later that uses the extra GPU.
I don't think this comparison takes the second GPU into account :-(
comments powered by Disqus