GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of TITAN Z vs TITAN X among Desktop GPUs


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more


T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more


Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

Nvidia GeForce GTX TITAN X 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX TITAN X  based on its benchmarks, compute performance and noise and power.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX TITAN Z

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX TITAN Z

Report a correction
Is dual GPU Yes vs No About half of graphics cards are dual GPU
Much higher texture rate 420.4 GTexel/s vs 192 GTexel/s Around 2.2x higher texture rate
Much better floating-point performance 10,092 GFLOPS vs 6,144 GFLOPS Around 65% better floating-point performance
Many more texture mapping units 480 vs 192 288 more texture mapping units
Many more shading units 5,760 vs 3,072 2688 more shading units
Much wider memory bus 768 bit vs 384 bit 2x wider memory bus
Higher pixel rate 105.12 GPixel/s vs 96 GPixel/s Around 10% higher pixel rate
Front view of GeForce GTX TITAN X

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX TITAN X

Report a correction
Significantly better PassMark score 10,669 vs 7,752 Around 40% better PassMark score
Higher clock speed 1,000 MHz vs 705 MHz More than 40% higher clock speed
Significantly better T-Rex score 11.39 frames/s vs 7.65 frames/s Around 50% better T-Rex score
Much higher battlefield 4 framerate 147 vs 76.5 More than 90% higher battlefield 4 framerate
Much better PassMark direct compute score 6,279 vs 3,418 Around 85% better PassMark direct compute score
Higher turbo clock speed 1,089 MHz vs 876 MHz Around 25% higher turbo clock speed
Better T-Rex score 8,001.79 vs 3,358.22 Around 2.5x better T-Rex score
Significantly lower TDP 250W vs 375W Around 35% lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs X

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

332.46 mHash/s
775.76 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

79.68 mPixels/s
224 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

1,933.42 frames/s
2,566.17 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

844.6 mInteraction/s
1,371.74 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench

7.65 frames/s
11.39 frames/s

Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench

83.61 frames/s
134.13 frames/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Battlefield 4


Showing 25 comments.
Nah, he lost, hardcore. It's funny how badly he lost. You lose too.
It's been proven. I don't need to prove it to you. 5k@30fps is horrid. FPS > resolution after 1440p 100% of the time.
Ain't Titan Z dual chip card, how come it lost?
*fap* GTX Titan P *fap* have found the graphics card that i want, now i just need to find the money
Can you provide me a link proving that the Titan X is better than GTX 1080 at 5K gaming?
The naysayer is almost always the idiot. I think the kitty won.
Not all games but most of the games are playable at 5K@30 FPS which is playable. And can you send me the links which proved you that GTX 1080 is better than Titan X at 5K gaming?
There's a few monitors but CARDS are not at the point that 5k is truly playable. Hell there's some games still that are hard to maintain full 60 FPS @4k on single cards, maybe with SLI you can pull it off. I've checked benchmark videos and I've done my research. Why don't you take your own goddamn advice and stop looking like an idiot? The 1080 is better than the Titan X even at 5K but neither card is sufficient to provide the performance needed for 5k. We'll need the next generation of video cards to truly be able to play at a fluid 60 fps at that resolution. Are you still going to continue to be this dense?
There are already a few monitors that support 5K and DisplayPort 1.3 supports 5K@60Hz so what makes it next generation? And you should probably check some benchmark videos before commenting because you look like the idiot here.
5k is a distant horizon still. Even if the Titax X beats the 1080 at that resolution (which it won't by the way), it's asinine to talk about it because *neither* card can even come close to the performance required to sustain even a minimum of 30fps at that resolution. You're talking at the very least, the next generation of video card chipset to be able to support 5k. So yes, you are a goddamn idiot as I said because you're arguing over something that's stupid to argue over. Also, you're still wrong, the 1080 beats the Titan X. Hands down. Stop talking. =)
I wonder what makes me an idiot.
5k gaming. You're a goddamn idiot.
Yeah just checked the 4K benchmarks. But I'm sure that Titan X will easily beat 1080 in 5K gaming.
Incorrect. 1080 GTX beats both Titan cards at all resolutions. Thanks for playing though!
Titan X will still buttfuck the 1080 at 4K and 5K gaming.
And then the GTX 1080 was announced - and both were COMPLETELY FUCKED IN THEIR BEAUTIFUL ANUS
this only benchmarks one of the gpus in the titan z as it is a dual gpu so this test isnt really fair as the whole gpu needs to be used.
And then the GTX 1080 was announced
Ive got the titan x, and i play all games on max/ultra settings with no problems, fps never reached <100, so yeah, for me the best invest :D btw. mine is the superclocked edition with stock fan cooler
I'm reading all of this peeps saying titan x is better and other say titan z and other sayin amd 295x... WHICH ONE IS BETTER FOR FK'S SAKE? lol I just wanna play all of these games on max settings with ease.
The only reason I use a Quadro is for 10-bit colour. I use a Titan X for rendering and what not.
Titan X for compute work and a Quadro for 10-bit colour is what my setup is.
not entirely true, there are a plethora of benifits of getting the z, it really depends on the person and their intended use. not all games/programs arw built the same.
Which is great if you want an energy bill that is ridiculous and all the issues that come with a dual GPU plus the fun of AMD drivers. I will never go back to an AMD GPU
its the fastest SINGLE Gpu on the market while the 295x2 is a dual GPU (and 2 290x, which essentially is a 295x2, will beat a single titan x, no doubt)
comments powered by Disqus