GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of TITAN vs 770

Gaming

Real world tests using the latest 3D games

crysis: warhead (2013), battlefield 3 (2013) and Far Cry 3

Benchmarks

Synthetic tests to measure overall performance

Passmark, 3DMark Vantage Texture Fill, 3DMark 11 Graphics and 2 more

Compute Performance

General computing tests executed on the GPU

Civilization 5 Texture Decomposition (2013), Passmark Direct Compute and 1 more

Noise and Power

How loud and hot does the card run idle and under load

TDP, Idle Noise Level, Load Noise Level, Idle Power Consumption and 1 more

GPUBoss Score

Gaming, Benchmarks, Compute Performance and Noise and Power

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX TITAN 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX TITAN  based on its gaming, benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX TITAN

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX TITAN

Report a correction
Much more memory 6,144 MB vs 2,048 MB 3x more memory
Significantly better 3DMark vantage texture fill score 172.3 vs 109.5 More than 55% better 3DMark vantage texture fill score
Better passmark score 7,966 vs 6,171 Around 30% better passmark score
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 46,180 vs 36,150 Around 30% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Better 3DMark06 score 38,420 vs 29,690 Around 30% better 3DMark06 score
Much better passmark direct compute score 8,728 vs 3,036 More than 2.8x better passmark direct compute score
Better floating-point performance 4,494 GFLOPS vs 3,213 GFLOPS Around 40% better floating-point performance
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 14,090 vs 11,310 Around 25% better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Higher texture rate 187.3 GTexel/s vs 134 GTexel/s Around 40% higher texture rate
Higher memory bandwidth 288.4 GB/s vs 224 GB/s Around 30% higher memory bandwidth
Significantly more texture mapping units 224 vs 128 96 more texture mapping units
Higher pixel rate 46.8 GPixel/s vs 33.5 GPixel/s Around 40% higher pixel rate
More shading units 2,688 vs 1,536 1152 more shading units
Significantly better CLBenchmark raytrace score 300,322 vs 164,636 More than 80% better CLBenchmark raytrace score
More render output processors 48 vs 32 16 more render output processors
Higher crysis: warhead framerate 78.9 fps vs 57 fps Around 40% higher crysis: warhead framerate
Higher far cry 3 framerate 64 fps vs 50.4 fps More than 25% higher far cry 3 framerate
Higher BioShock infinite framerate 103.7 fps vs 83.4 fps Around 25% higher BioShock infinite framerate
Wider memory bus 384 bit vs 256 bit 50% wider memory bus
Significantly more SMX units 14 vs 8 6 more SMX units
Higher battlefield 3 framerate 137.1 fps vs 126.2 fps Around 10% higher battlefield 3 framerate
Slightly better civilization 5 texture decomposition (2013) score 410 vs 395 Around 5% better civilization 5 texture decomposition (2013) score
Front view of GeForce GTX 770

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 1,046 MHz vs 836 MHz More than 25% higher clock speed
Much more energy-efficient load power consumption 246W vs 429W Around 45% more energy-efficient load power consumption
Higher effective memory clock speed 7,012 MHz vs 6,008 MHz More than 15% higher effective memory clock speed
Significantly higher turbo clock speed 1,085 MHz vs 876 MHz Around 25% higher turbo clock speed
Quieter load noise level 46.7 dB vs 51 dB Around 10% quieter load noise level
Higher memory clock speed 1,753 MHz vs 1,502 MHz More than 15% higher memory clock speed

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX TITAN vs 770

Passmark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performance

3DMark Vantage (Texture Fill) Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX performance

3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance

GeForce GTX TITAN GeForce GTX 770 @ community.futuremark.com

Crysis: Warhead (2013) 1920x1080 - Enthusiast Quality + 4xAA

In a nutshell, Far Cry 3 is everything gamers missed in Far Cry 2 (after Crytek was tossed out of the franchise by Ubisoft) and even Crysis 2 (in which Crytek swaps the tropical paradise setting for grim, apocalyptic New York).
GeForce GTX TITAN | by techPowerUp! (Feb, 2013)

Far Cry 3 1920 x 1080 - Ultra Quality + 4x MSAA + Enh. AtoC

In comparison, NVIDIA's "Free to Play bundle" which gives you about $25~$50 worth of in-game currency (per game) with free-to-play games such as Hawken, World of Tanks, and Planetside 2, only makes NVIDIA look bad.
GeForce GTX TITAN | by techPowerUp! (Feb, 2013)

BioShock Infinite 1920 x 1080 - Ultra preset + DX11 (DDOF)

GeForce GTX TITAN
103.7 fps
GeForce GTX 770
83.4 fps

Reviews Word on the street

GeForce GTX TITAN  vs 770 

8.9
9.6
The GTX 770 WindForce OC is no different, but the improvement over the reference design cooler is, nevertheless, not that big because NVIDIA's cooler is already quite good.
GeForce GTX 770

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus