GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of TITAN vs 770 among Desktop GPUs over $400


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more


T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor


Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more


Overall Score

Nvidia GeForce GTX TITAN 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX TITAN  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX TITAN

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX TITAN

Report a correction
Significantly better 3DMark06 score 38,420 vs 29,690 Around 30% better 3DMark06 score
Significantly more memory 6,144 MB vs 2,048 MB 3x more memory
Better PassMark score 7,881 vs 6,099 Around 30% better PassMark score
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 46,180 vs 36,150 Around 30% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Significantly higher memory bandwidth 288.4 GB/s vs 224 GB/s Around 30% higher memory bandwidth
Significantly more texture mapping units 224 vs 128 96 more texture mapping units
Better floating-point performance 4,494 GFLOPS vs 3,213 GFLOPS Around 40% better floating-point performance
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 14,090 vs 11,310 Around 25% better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Higher texture rate 187.3 GTexel/s vs 134 GTexel/s Around 40% higher texture rate
Significantly more shading units 2,688 vs 1,536 1152 more shading units
More render output processors 48 vs 32 16 more render output processors
Higher pixel rate 46.8 GPixel/s vs 33.5 GPixel/s Around 40% higher pixel rate
Better ocean surface simulation score 1,844.01 frames/s vs 1,631.29 frames/s Around 15% better ocean surface simulation score
Higher BioShock infinite framerate 103.7 fps vs 83.4 fps Around 25% higher BioShock infinite framerate
Better cloud gate factor score 22.82 vs 21.07 Around 10% better cloud gate factor score
Better PassMark direct compute score 4,122 vs 3,083 Around 35% better PassMark direct compute score
Slightly wider memory bus 384 bit vs 256 bit 50% wider memory bus
Front view of GeForce GTX 770

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1,046 MHz vs 836 MHz More than 25% higher clock speed
Higher effective memory clock speed 7,012 MHz vs 6,008 MHz More than 15% higher effective memory clock speed
Higher turbo clock speed 1,085 MHz vs 876 MHz Around 25% higher turbo clock speed
Higher memory clock speed 1,753 MHz vs 1,502 MHz More than 15% higher memory clock speed
Higher crysis 3 framerate 84 vs 70 20% higher crysis 3 framerate
Lower TDP 230W vs 250W Around 10% lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX TITAN vs 770

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

178.74 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 770
103.88 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

66.03 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 770
50.95 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

1,844.01 frames/s
GeForce GTX 770
1,631.29 frames/s

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Metro: Last Light

Reviews Word on the street

GeForce GTX TITAN  vs 770 

The GTX 770 WindForce OC is no different, but the improvement over the reference design cooler is, nevertheless, not that big because NVIDIA's cooler is already quite good.
GeForce GTX 770

Read more


comments powered by Disqus