Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti based on its compute performance.
See full details | GeForce GTX TITAN vs 780 Ti |
Gaming | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more |
Graphics | |
| |
T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more |
Computing | |
| |
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more |
Performance per Watt | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Value | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Noise and Power | |
| |
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more |
8 | Overall Score |
| |
Winner |
| ![]() | Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 TiGPUBoss Winner |
| |||||||
Much better 3DMark06 score | 38,420 | vs | 15,619 | Around 2.5x better 3DMark06 score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
More memory | 6,144 MB | vs | 3,072 MB | 2x more memory | |||
Much higher crysis 3 framerate | 89.2 fps | vs | 60.3 fps | Around 50% higher crysis 3 framerate | |||
Better particle simulation score | 939.65 mInteraction/s | vs | 764.93 mInteraction/s | Around 25% better particle simulation score | |||
| |||||||
Better PassMark score | 8,890 | vs | 7,881 | Around 15% better PassMark score | |||
Higher memory bandwidth | 336 GB/s | vs | 288.4 GB/s | More than 15% higher memory bandwidth | |||
Higher effective memory clock speed | 7,000 MHz | vs | 6,008 MHz | More than 15% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
Slightly better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 15,630 | vs | 14,090 | More than 10% better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
Better floating-point performance | 5,040 GFLOPS | vs | 4,494 GFLOPS | More than 10% better floating-point performance | |||
Higher texture rate | 210 GTexel/s | vs | 187.3 GTexel/s | More than 10% higher texture rate | |||
Significantly higher metro: last light framerate | 80.9 | vs | 42 | Around 95% higher metro: last light framerate | |||
Higher turbo clock speed | 1,020 MHz | vs | 876 MHz | More than 15% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Higher memory clock speed | 1,752 MHz | vs | 1,502 MHz | More than 15% higher memory clock speed | |||
More texture mapping units | 240 | vs | 224 | 16 more texture mapping units | |||
Higher BioShock infinite framerate | 116.4 fps | vs | 103.7 fps | More than 10% higher BioShock infinite framerate | |||
Slightly more shading units | 2,880 | vs | 2,688 | 192 more shading units | |||
Better PassMark direct compute score | 4,688 | vs | 4,122 | Around 15% better PassMark direct compute score |
GeForce GTX TITAN | vs | 780 Ti | ||
![]() | 8.9 | 9.4 |
---|
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
GeForce GTX 1060 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
Radeon RX 580 vs GeForce GTX 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
GeForce GTX 960 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
GeForce GTX 960 vs 750 Ti | ||