GeForce GTX TITAN vs 780 Ti |
Released February, 2013
Nvidia GeForce GTX TITAN
- 836 MHz
- 6 GB GDDR5
9.4 Out of 10
by techPowerUp! (Feb, 2013)In terms of clock speeds, the GeForce GTX Titan core doesn't get anywhere close to the 1 GHz mark, which is characteristic of every big chip from NVIDIA.
VS
Released November, 2013
Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti
- 875 MHz
- 3 GB GDDR5
9.4 Out of 10
by techPowerUp!The card comes overclocked to 980 MHz base clock out of the box, which is a 12% increase over the NVIDIA reference design.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of TITAN vs 780 Ti
Gaming | |
Real world tests using the latest 3D games | |
| crysis: warhead (2013), Crysis: Warhead (2012), Batman: Arkham City and 6 more | |
Benchmarks | |
Synthetic tests to measure overall performance | |
| Passmark, 3DMark Vantage Texture Fill, 3DMark 11 Graphics and 2 more | |
Compute Performance | |
General computing tests executed on the GPU | |
| Civilization 5 Texture Decomposition (2013) and Passmark Direct Compute | |
Noise and Power | |
How loud and hot does the card run idle and under load | |
| TDP, Idle Noise Level, Load Noise Level, Idle Power Consumption and 1 more | |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much more memory | 6,144 MB | vs | 3,072 MB | 2x more memory | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Better 3DMark06 score | 38,420 | vs | 35,190 | Around 10% better 3DMark06 score | |||
| Quieter idle noise level | 37.8 dB | vs | 38.6 dB | Almost the same | |||
| Slightly better civilization 5 texture decomposition (2013) score | 410 | vs | 396 | Around 5% better civilization 5 texture decomposition (2013) score | |||
| |||||||
| Much more energy-efficient idle power consumption | 80W | vs | 111W | Around 30% more energy-efficient idle power consumption | |||
| Better passmark score | 8,733 | vs | 7,986 | Around 10% better passmark score | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 7,000 MHz | vs | 6,008 MHz | More than 15% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Higher clock speed | 875 MHz | vs | 836 MHz | Around 5% higher clock speed | |||
| Significantly higher turbo clock speed | 1,020 MHz | vs | 876 MHz | More than 15% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 336 GB/s | vs | 288.4 GB/s | More than 15% higher memory bandwidth | |||
| More energy-efficient load power consumption | 372W | vs | 429W | Around 15% more energy-efficient load power consumption | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 5,040 GFLOPS | vs | 4,494 GFLOPS | More than 10% better floating-point performance | |||
| Higher texture rate | 210 GTexel/s | vs | 187.3 GTexel/s | More than 10% higher texture rate | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 52.5 GPixel/s | vs | 46.8 GPixel/s | More than 10% higher pixel rate | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,752 MHz | vs | 1,502 MHz | More than 15% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Slightly better passmark direct compute score | 4,793 | vs | 4,458 | Around 10% better passmark direct compute score | |||
| More SMX units | 15 | vs | 14 | 1 more SMX units | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX TITAN vs 780 Ti
Passmark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performance
3DMark Vantage (Texture Fill) Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX performance
3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance
3DMark Vantage Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 10 GPU performance
Civilization 5 Texture Decomp (2013) Using the newest graphics cards Civ V can speed screen transitions by reducing texture sizes
Passmark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute
Reviews Word on the street
| GeForce GTX TITAN | vs | 780 Ti | ||
 | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
Read more
Comments
Showing 8 comments.
