GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of TITAN vs 970 among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

7.7

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX TITAN 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX TITAN  based on its benchmarks.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX TITAN

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX TITAN

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 38,420 vs 15,071 More than 2.5x better 3DMark06 score
Higher memory bandwidth 288.4 GB/s vs 224.4 GB/s Around 30% higher memory bandwidth
More memory 6,144 MB vs 4,096 MB 50% more memory
Many more texture mapping units 224 vs 104 120 more texture mapping units
Higher texture rate 187.3 GTexel/s vs 109.2 GTexel/s More than 70% higher texture rate
Much higher crysis 3 framerate 89.2 fps vs 50.6 fps More than 75% higher crysis 3 framerate
Better floating-point performance 4,494 GFLOPS vs 3,494 GFLOPS Around 30% better floating-point performance
More shading units 2,688 vs 1,664 1024 more shading units
Higher crysis 3 framerate 70 vs 52.8 Around 35% higher crysis 3 framerate
Front view of GeForce GTX 970

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1,050 MHz vs 836 MHz More than 25% higher clock speed
Slightly better PassMark score 8,567 vs 7,874 Around 10% better PassMark score
Higher effective memory clock speed 7,012 MHz vs 6,008 MHz More than 15% higher effective memory clock speed
Higher turbo clock speed 1,178 MHz vs 876 MHz Around 35% higher turbo clock speed
Better particle simulation score 1,122.49 mInteraction/s vs 666.03 mInteraction/s Around 70% better particle simulation score
Higher pixel rate 58.8 GPixel/s vs 46.8 GPixel/s More than 25% higher pixel rate
More render output processors 56 vs 48 8 more render output processors
Higher memory clock speed 1,753 MHz vs 1,502 MHz More than 15% higher memory clock speed
Significantly lower TDP 148W vs 250W More than 40% lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX TITAN vs 970

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX TITAN
178.74 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 970
480.34 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX TITAN
65.97 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 970
148.39 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX TITAN
1,842.37 frames/s
GeForce GTX 970
1,587.13 frames/s

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Bioshock Infinite

Reviews Word on the street

GeForce GTX TITAN  vs 970 

8.9
9.7
Today, we're reviewing the EVGA GeForce GTX 970 SuperClocked ACX, a non-reference design, factory-overclocked GTX 970 graphics card, which comes with a custom-design PCB, and the company's signature ACX cooler, which features an aluminium stack heatsink that uses a trio of copper heat pipes, to draw heat directly from the GPU die, and dissipate it under the airflow of two 80 mm fans.
GeForce GTX 970

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus