GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of MX150 vs 940M among all GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce MX150

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce MX150

Report a correction
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 6,008 MHz vs 1,800 MHz More than 3.2x higher effective memory clock speed
Higher clock speed 1,227 MHz vs 1,072 MHz Around 15% higher clock speed
Higher memory bandwidth 48.06 GB/s vs 14.4 GB/s More than 3.2x higher memory bandwidth
Higher turbo clock speed 1,468 MHz vs 1,176 MHz Around 25% higher turbo clock speed
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,502 MHz vs 900 MHz More than 65% higher memory clock speed
Front view of GeForce 940M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 940M

Report a correction

GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 940M Retail vs the MX150.

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce MX150 vs 940M

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce MX150
3,361.88
GeForce 940M
3,361.82

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce MX150
3,717.82
GeForce 940M
3,713.26

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus