GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of MX150 vs 940MX among all GPUs

Gaming

GeForce MX150
n.d.
GeForce 940MX
5.3
GeForce GTX 660
6.9
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

GeForce MX150
5.3
GeForce 940MX
5.6
GeForce GTX 660
7.2
T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

GeForce MX150
6.0
GeForce 940MX
5.7
GeForce GTX 660
5.8
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

GeForce MX150
7.3
GeForce 940MX
7.2
GeForce GTX 660
7.3
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

GeForce MX150
9.9
GeForce 940MX
9.9
GeForce GTX 660
9.0
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Nvidia GeForce MX150

Front view of GeForce MX150
Front view of GeForce 940MX

Nvidia GeForce 940MX

Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce MX150

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce MX150

Report a correction
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 6,008 MHz vs 2,002 MHz More than 3x higher effective memory clock speed
Higher clock speed 1,227 MHz vs 1,122 MHz Around 10% higher clock speed
Higher memory bandwidth 48.06 GB/s vs 16.02 GB/s More than 3x higher memory bandwidth
Higher turbo clock speed 1,468 MHz vs 1,242 MHz Around 20% higher turbo clock speed
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,502 MHz vs 1,001 MHz More than 50% higher memory clock speed
Slightly better ocean surface simulation score 490.6 frames/s vs 313.03 frames/s More than 55% better ocean surface simulation score
Front view of GeForce 940MX

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 940MX

Report a correction

GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 940MX vs the MX150.

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce MX150 vs 940MX

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce MX150
153.69 mHash/s
GeForce 940MX
103.58 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce MX150
46.95 mPixels/s
GeForce 940MX
30.45 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce MX150
490.6 frames/s
GeForce 940MX
313.03 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce MX150
395.72 mInteraction/s
GeForce 940MX
334.85 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce MX150
2.39 frames/s
GeForce 940MX
1.85 frames/s

Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce MX150
39.77 frames/s
GeForce 940MX
28.08 frames/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce MX150
3,351.4
GeForce 940MX
3,362.58

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce MX150
3,709.92
GeForce 940MX
3,663.44

Comments

Showing 3 comments.
Ihor Harbuziuk (08:47 AM, April 11, 2018)
thanks a lot!
Guest (02:43 PM, November 18, 2017)
Did they actually RUN any benchmarks, or just guessed random numbers LOL?? The Pascal-based MX150 is about 50% improvement in every single way over the old Maxwell 940MX. Read a proper benchmark comparison here: https://www.notebookcheck.net/Comparison-NVIDIA-GeForce-MX150-vs-NVIDIA-GeForce-940MX.242750.0.html or http://laptopmedia.com/comparisons/nvidia-geforce-mx150-vs-940m-940mx-and-950m-benchmarks-and-gaming-comparison/
lesspowar (11:38 AM, October 31, 2017)
MX150 was made as an upgrade to 940MX, but benchmarks doesn't really make it so.
comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

GPUBoss