GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of MX150 vs 940MX among all GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce MX150

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce MX150

Report a correction
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 6,008 MHz vs 2,002 MHz More than 3x higher effective memory clock speed
Higher clock speed 1,227 MHz vs 1,122 MHz Around 10% higher clock speed
Higher memory bandwidth 48.06 GB/s vs 16.02 GB/s More than 3x higher memory bandwidth
Higher turbo clock speed 1,468 MHz vs 1,242 MHz Around 20% higher turbo clock speed
Higher memory clock speed 1,502 MHz vs 1,001 MHz More than 50% higher memory clock speed
Front view of GeForce 940MX

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 940MX

Report a correction
Slightly lower TDP 23W vs 30W Around 25% lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce MX150 vs 940MX

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce MX150
3,361.88
GeForce 940MX
3,357.58

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce MX150
3,717.82
GeForce 940MX
3,681.82

Comments

Showing 1 comment.
MX150 was made as an upgrade to 940MX, but benchmarks doesn't really make it so.
comments powered by Disqus