Winner
Nvidia GeForce MX150
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce MX150 based on its .
See full details GeForce MX150 vs GT 120M |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of MX150 vs 120M among all GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 6.2 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much higher clock speed | 1,227 MHz | vs | 500 MHz | Around 2.5x higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much higher effective memory clock speed | 6,008 MHz | vs | 1,000 MHz | More than 6x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Much higher memory clock speed | 1,502 MHz | vs | 500 MHz | More than 3x higher memory clock speed | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 1,127 GFLOPS | vs | 80 GFLOPS | More than 14x better floating-point performance | |||
| Slightly more memory | 2,048 MB | vs | 1,024 MB | 2x more memory | |||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB/s | vs | 16 GB/s | More than 3x higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Slightly higher texture rate | 35.23 GTexel/s | vs | 8 GTexel/s | Around 4.5x higher texture rate | |||
| Slightly higher pixel rate | 11.74 GPixel/s | vs | 4 GPixel/s | Around 3x higher pixel rate | |||
| More shading units | 384 | vs | 32 | 352 more shading units | |||
| |||||||
| Slightly wider memory bus | 128 bit | vs | 64 bit | 2x wider memory bus | |||
| Slightly lower TDP | 14W | vs | 30W | 2.1x lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce MX150 vs GT 120M
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Features Key features of the GeForce MX150 vs GT 120M
memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 1050 vs MX150 | ||
 | VS | |
| 940MX vs MX150 | ||
 | VS | |
| 950M vs MX150 | ||
 | VS | |
| 960M vs MX150 | ||
 | VS | |
| $200 | ||
| 660 vs MX150 | ||
 | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs MX150 | ||
 | VS | |
| 1050 Mobile vs MX150 | ||
Popular Comparisons
| | VS |  |
| $267 | ||
| 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
 | VS | |
| $267 | ||
| RX 580 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $267 | ||
| 1060 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
 | VS | |
| 960 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $274 | ||
| 960 vs 750 Ti | ||
