GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of MX150 vs 650M among all GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce MX150

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce MX150

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 1,227 MHz vs 850 MHz Around 45% higher clock speed
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 6,008 MHz vs 1,800 MHz More than 3.2x higher effective memory clock speed
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,502 MHz vs 900 MHz More than 65% higher memory clock speed
Front view of GeForce GT 650M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 650M

Report a correction
More render output processors 16 vs 8 Twice as many render output processors

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce MX150 vs GT 650M

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce MX150
3,361.88
GeForce GT 650M
3,360.34

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce MX150
3,717.82
GeForce GT 650M
3,368.97

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus