Winner
Nvidia GeForce MX150
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce MX150 based on its .
See full details GeForce MX150 vs GTX 1050 |
Released May, 2017
Nvidia GeForce MX150
- 1.2 GHz
- 2 GB GDDR5
6.3 Out of 10
by Ryan-Shrout (Feb, 2013)Do you think NVIDIA's new GeForce GTX gaming bundle for free-to-play game credits can be successful!
VS
Released October, 2016
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
- 1.4 GHz
- 2 GB GDDR5
7.8 Out of 10
by www.tweaktown.com (Oct, 2016)NVIDIA's impressive Pascal architecture has some nice tricks under its 16nm FinFET hood, but the Twin Frozr VI cooler is 40% quieter than its predecessor (the Twin Frozr V), and it also keeps the card 20% cooler.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of MX150 vs 1050 among all GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 7.8 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Lower TDP | 30W | vs | 75W | 2.5x lower TDP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
| Much better T-Rex score | 32,577.42 | vs | 3,361.22 | Around 9.8x better T-Rex score | |||
| Higher clock speed | 1,354 MHz | vs | 1,227 MHz | More than 10% higher clock speed | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 46.56 GPixel/s | vs | 11.74 GPixel/s | Around 4x higher pixel rate | |||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB/s | vs | 48.06 GB/s | More than 2.2x higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 7,008 MHz | vs | 6,008 MHz | More than 15% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| More render output processors | 32 | vs | 8 | 24 more render output processors | |||
| Slightly better floating-point performance | 1,862 GFLOPS | vs | 1,127 GFLOPS | More than 65% better floating-point performance | |||
| Slightly higher texture rate | 58.2 GTexel/s | vs | 35.23 GTexel/s | More than 65% higher texture rate | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,752 MHz | vs | 1,502 MHz | More than 15% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Slightly more shading units | 640 | vs | 384 | 256 more shading units | |||
| Slightly more texture mapping units | 40 | vs | 24 | 16 more texture mapping units | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce MX150 vs GTX 1050
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench
Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 1050 Ti vs 1050 | ||
 | VS | |
| 960 vs 1050 | ||
 | VS | |
| 750 Ti vs 1050 | ||
 | VS | |
| RX 560 vs 1050 | ||
 | VS | |
| 940MX vs 1050 | ||
 | VS | |
| RX 550 vs 1050 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 940MX vs MX150 | ||
Popular Comparisons
| | VS |  |
| $280 | ||
| 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $280 | ||
| 1060 vs 970 | ||
 | VS | |
| $280 | ||
| RX 580 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 1050 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 11 comments.
