GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of MX150 vs 660 among all GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.6

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce MX150 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce MX150  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce MX150

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce MX150

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 1,227 MHz vs 823 MHz Around 50% higher clock speed
Much higher turbo clock speed 1,468 MHz vs 888 MHz More than 65% higher turbo clock speed
Better manhattan score 3,723.7 vs 3,282.26 Around 15% better manhattan score
Slightly higher memory clock speed 1,502 MHz vs 1,400 MHz More than 5% higher memory clock speed
Significantly lower TDP 30W vs 130W 4.3x lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 660

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660

Report a correction
Significantly higher memory bandwidth 179.2 GB/s vs 48.06 GB/s Around 3.8x higher memory bandwidth
More texture mapping units 96 vs 24 72 more texture mapping units
More render output processors 32 vs 8 24 more render output processors
Higher texture rate 79 GTexel/s vs 35.23 GTexel/s Around 2.2x higher texture rate
Slightly better floating-point performance 1,896.2 GFLOPS vs 1,127 GFLOPS Around 70% better floating-point performance
More shading units 1,152 vs 384 Three times as many shading units
Slightly higher pixel rate 19.75 GPixel/s vs 11.74 GPixel/s Around 70% higher pixel rate
Wider memory bus 256 bit vs 64 bit 4x wider memory bus

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce MX150 vs GTX 660

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce MX150
153.69 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 660
67.94 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce MX150
46.95 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 660
30.41 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce MX150
490.6 frames/s
GeForce GTX 660
706.33 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce MX150
395.72 mInteraction/s
GeForce GTX 660
370.11 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce MX150
2.39 frames/s
GeForce GTX 660
3.08 frames/s

Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce MX150
39.77 frames/s
GeForce GTX 660
54.59 frames/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce MX150
3,363.82
GeForce GTX 660
3,352.64

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce MX150
3,723.7
GeForce GTX 660
3,282.26

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus