GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of MX150 vs 660 among all GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.7

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce MX150 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce MX150  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce MX150

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce MX150

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 1,227 MHz vs 823 MHz Around 50% higher clock speed
Significantly higher turbo clock speed 1,468 MHz vs 888 MHz More than 65% higher turbo clock speed
Significantly lower TDP 30W vs 130W 4.3x lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 660

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660

Report a correction
Significantly higher memory bandwidth 179.2 GB/s vs 48.06 GB/s Around 3.8x higher memory bandwidth
More texture mapping units 96 vs 24 72 more texture mapping units
More render output processors 32 vs 8 24 more render output processors
Higher texture rate 79 GTexel/s vs 35.23 GTexel/s Around 2.2x higher texture rate
Slightly better floating-point performance 1,896.2 GFLOPS vs 1,127 GFLOPS Around 70% better floating-point performance
More shading units 1,152 vs 384 Three times as many shading units

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce MX150 vs GTX 660

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce MX150
3,361.88
GeForce GTX 660
3,342.27

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce MX150
3,717.82
GeForce GTX 660
3,711.2

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus