GeForce MX150 vs GTX 950M |
VS
Released March, 2015
Nvidia GeForce GTX 950M
- 993 MHz
- 4 GB DDR3
6.2 Out of 10
by Anthony-Garreffa (Aug, 2015)If you were to take down the in-game visual settings a notch or two, you could maintain 30FPS+ in nearly any game on the market right now.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of MX150 vs 950M among all GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly higher effective memory clock speed | 6,008 MHz | vs | 1,800 MHz | More than 3.2x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher clock speed | 1,227 MHz | vs | 993 MHz | Around 25% higher clock speed | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 1,468 MHz | vs | 1,124 MHz | More than 30% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Significantly higher memory clock speed | 1,502 MHz | vs | 900 MHz | More than 65% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Lower TDP | 30W | vs | 75W | 2.5x lower TDP | |||
| |||||||
| More memory | 4,096 MB | vs | 2,048 MB | 2x more memory | |||
| More render output processors | 16 | vs | 8 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
Report a correction
