Winner
Nvidia GeForce MX150
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce MX150 based on its .
See full details GeForce MX150 vs GTX 950M |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of MX150 vs 950M among all GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 6.2 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly higher effective memory clock speed | 6,008 MHz | vs | 1,800 MHz | More than 3.2x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher clock speed | 1,227 MHz | vs | 993 MHz | Around 25% higher clock speed | |||
| Significantly higher turbo clock speed | 1,468 MHz | vs | 1,124 MHz | More than 30% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Significantly higher memory clock speed | 1,502 MHz | vs | 900 MHz | More than 65% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Lower TDP | 30W | vs | 75W | 2.5x lower TDP | |||
| |||||||
| More memory | 4,096 MB | vs | 2,048 MB | 2x more memory | |||
| More render output processors | 16 | vs | 8 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce MX150 vs GTX 950M
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench
Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
Read more
Comments
Showing 1 comment.
