GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of MX150 vs 960 among all GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

7.4

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce MX150 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce MX150  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce MX150

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce MX150

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1,227 MHz vs 1,127 MHz Around 10% higher clock speed
Higher turbo clock speed 1,468 MHz vs 1,178 MHz Around 25% higher turbo clock speed
Better video composition score 39.77 frames/s vs 25.99 frames/s Around 55% better video composition score
Lower TDP 30W vs 120W 4x lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 960

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

Report a correction
Higher memory bandwidth 112.2 GB/s vs 48.06 GB/s More than 2.2x higher memory bandwidth
Higher pixel rate 36.1 GPixel/s vs 11.74 GPixel/s More than 3x higher pixel rate
Higher effective memory clock speed 7,012 MHz vs 6,008 MHz More than 15% higher effective memory clock speed
Better floating-point performance 2,308.1 GFLOPS vs 1,127 GFLOPS More than 2x better floating-point performance
More render output processors 32 vs 8 24 more render output processors
Higher texture rate 72.1 GTexel/s vs 35.23 GTexel/s More than 2x higher texture rate
More shading units 1,024 vs 384 640 more shading units
More texture mapping units 64 vs 24 40 more texture mapping units
Higher memory clock speed 1,753 MHz vs 1,502 MHz More than 15% higher memory clock speed

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce MX150 vs GTX 960

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce MX150
153.69 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 960
111.95 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce MX150
46.95 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 960
69.13 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce MX150
490.6 frames/s
GeForce GTX 960
780.9 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce MX150
395.72 mInteraction/s
GeForce GTX 960
710.39 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce MX150
2.39 frames/s
GeForce GTX 960
3.92 frames/s

Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce MX150
39.77 frames/s
GeForce GTX 960
25.99 frames/s

Comments

comments powered by Disqus