GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of MX150 vs 960M among all GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.6

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce MX150 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce MX150  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce MX150

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce MX150

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1,227 MHz vs 1,097 MHz More than 10% higher clock speed
Higher effective memory clock speed 6,008 MHz vs 5,012 MHz Around 20% higher effective memory clock speed
Higher turbo clock speed 1,468 MHz vs 1,176 MHz Around 25% higher turbo clock speed
Higher memory clock speed 1,502 MHz vs 1,253 MHz Around 20% higher memory clock speed
Lower TDP 30W vs 75W 2.5x lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 960M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M

Report a correction
Higher memory bandwidth 80.2 GB/s vs 48.06 GB/s More than 65% higher memory bandwidth
More render output processors 16 vs 8 Twice as many render output processors

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce MX150 vs GTX 960M

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce MX150
3,361.88
GeForce GTX 960M
1,927.99

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce MX150
3,717.82
GeForce GTX 960M
2,851.98

Comments

comments powered by Disqus