Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce MX150

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce MX150

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1,227 MHz vs 1,038 MHz Around 20% higher clock speed
Significantly higher turbo clock speed 1,468 MHz vs 993 MHz Around 50% higher turbo clock speed
Higher effective memory clock speed 6,008 MHz vs 5,012 MHz Around 20% higher effective memory clock speed
Higher memory clock speed 1,502 MHz vs 1,253 MHz Around 20% higher memory clock speed
Front view of GeForce GTX 970M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970M

Report a correction
More memory 6,144 MB vs 2,048 MB 3x more memory
Significantly higher pixel rate 49.8 GPixel/s vs 11.74 GPixel/s Around 4.2x higher pixel rate
Higher memory bandwidth 120.3 GB/s vs 48.06 GB/s More than 2.5x higher memory bandwidth
Significantly more render output processors 48 vs 8 40 more render output processors
Better floating-point performance 2,657.3 GFLOPS vs 1,127 GFLOPS More than 2.2x better floating-point performance
Higher texture rate 83 GTexel/s vs 35.23 GTexel/s More than 2.2x higher texture rate
Significantly better particle simulation score 857.6 mInteraction/s vs 395.72 mInteraction/s Around 2.2x better particle simulation score
More shading units 1,280 vs 384 896 more shading units
More texture mapping units 80 vs 24 56 more texture mapping units
Slightly wider memory bus 192 bit vs 64 bit 3x wider memory bus

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce MX150 vs GTX 970M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce MX150
153.69 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 970M
81.91 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce MX150
46.95 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 970M
98.31 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce MX150
490.6 frames/s
GeForce GTX 970M
1,150.18 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce MX150
395.72 mInteraction/s
GeForce GTX 970M
857.6 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce MX150
2.39 frames/s
GeForce GTX 970M
4.16 frames/s

Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce MX150
39.77 frames/s
GeForce GTX 970M
39.1 frames/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce MX150
3,363.82
GeForce GTX 970M
3,361.56

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce MX150
3,723.7
GeForce GTX 970M
3,721.44

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus