Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Mobility Radeon HD 4350

Reasons to consider the
ATi Mobility Radeon HD 4350

Report a correction

GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the ATi Mobility Radeon HD 4350 vs the Nvidia GeForce GT 240.

Front view of GeForce GT 240

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 240

Report a correction
Higher effective memory clock speed 3,400 MHz vs 1,200 MHz More than 2.8x higher effective memory clock speed
Higher clock speed 550 MHz vs 450 MHz More than 20% higher clock speed
Higher memory bandwidth 54.4 GB/s vs 9.6 GB/s Around 5.8x higher memory bandwidth
More texture mapping units 32 vs 8 24 more texture mapping units
Higher memory clock speed 850 MHz vs 600 MHz More than 40% higher memory clock speed

Benchmarks Real world tests of Mobility Radeon HD 4350 vs GeForce GT 240

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

Features Key features of the Mobility Radeon HD 4350  vs GeForce GT 240 

memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

GeForce GT 240
4.4 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

GeForce GT 240
17.6 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

GeForce GT 240
257.3 GFLOPS

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus