0 Comments
| Mobility Radeon HD 4650 vs GeForce 9600M GT |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much better T-Rex score | 3,335.81 | vs | 2,024.88 | Around 65% better T-Rex score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
More shading units | 320 | vs | 32 | 288 more shading units | |||
More texture mapping units | 32 | vs | 16 | Twice as many texture mapping units | |||
| |||||||
Higher memory clock speed | 800 MHz | vs | 600 MHz | Around 35% higher memory clock speed |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Mobility Radeon HD 4650 vs GeForce 9600M GT
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Mobility Radeon HD 4650
3,335.81
GeForce 9600M GT
2,024.88
Features Key features of the Mobility Radeon HD 4650 vs GeForce 9600M GT
memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory
Mobility Radeon HD 4650
19.2 GB/s
GeForce 9600M GT
25.6 GB/s
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
Mobility Radeon HD 4650
4 GPixel/s
GeForce 9600M GT
4 GPixel/s
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
Mobility Radeon HD 4650
16 GTexel/s
GeForce 9600M GT
8 GTexel/s
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
Mobility Radeon HD 4650
320 GFLOPS
GeForce 9600M GT
80 GFLOPS
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
970 vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs R9 380 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs R9 390 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
750 Ti vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R9 290X vs 970 | ||