0 Comments
| Mobility Radeon HD 4850 vs GeForce 840M |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Higher memory bandwidth | 54.4 GB/s | vs | 16.02 GB/s | Around 3.5x higher memory bandwidth | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much wider memory bus | 256 bit | vs | 64 bit | 4x wider memory bus | |||
More shading units | 800 | vs | 384 | 416 more shading units | |||
More texture mapping units | 40 | vs | 16 | 24 more texture mapping units | |||
More render output processors | 16 | vs | 8 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
Slightly better cloud gate factor score | 12.33 | vs | 10.08 | More than 20% better cloud gate factor score | |||
| |||||||
Much better T-Rex score | 3,359.62 | vs | 2,486.38 | More than 35% better T-Rex score | |||
Much higher clock speed | 1,029 MHz | vs | 500 MHz | More than 2x higher clock speed | |||
Higher memory clock speed | 1,001 MHz | vs | 850 MHz | Around 20% higher memory clock speed |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Mobility Radeon HD 4850 vs GeForce 840M
PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark
GeForce 840M
879
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Mobility Radeon HD 4850
2,486.38
GeForce 840M
3,359.62
Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Mobility Radeon HD 4850
12.33
GeForce 840M
10.08