GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 5430 vs 660 among all GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 660  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Mobility Radeon HD 5430

Reasons to consider the
ATi Mobility Radeon HD 5430

Report a correction
Significantly lower TDP 7W vs 130W 18.6x lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 660

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 18,060 vs 3,082 More than 5.8x better 3DMark06 score
Significantly better 3DMark vantage graphics score 25,130 vs 750 More than 33.5x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Better PassMark score 4,118 vs 181 More than 22.8x better PassMark score
Much higher memory bandwidth 179.2 GB/s vs 12.8 GB/s Around 14x higher memory bandwidth
Higher clock speed 823 MHz vs 500 MHz Around 65% higher clock speed
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 5,600 MHz vs 1,600 MHz 3.5x higher effective memory clock speed
Much better manhattan score 3,718.88 vs 904.53 More than 4x better manhattan score
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 6,850 vs 3,082 Around 2.2x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Better floating-point performance 1,896.2 GFLOPS vs 80 GFLOPS Around 23.8x better floating-point performance
Higher texture rate 79 GTexel/s vs 4 GTexel/s 19.8x higher texture rate
Significantly better fire strike factor score 43.94 vs 2.06 More than 21.2x better fire strike factor score
Significantly more texture mapping units 96 vs 8 88 more texture mapping units
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
More render output processors 32 vs 4 28 more render output processors
More shading units 1,152 vs 80 1072 more shading units
Higher pixel rate 19.75 GPixel/s vs 2 GPixel/s Around 10x higher pixel rate
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,400 MHz vs 800 MHz 75% higher memory clock speed
Better T-Rex score 2.39 frames/s vs -1 frames/s Around 350% better T-Rex score
Better PassMark direct compute score 1,937 vs 57 Around 34x better PassMark direct compute score

Benchmarks Real world tests of Mobility Radeon HD 5430 vs GeForce GTX 660

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 660
60.88 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 660
28.6 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 660
879.2 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Mobility Radeon HD 5430
25.06 mInteraction/s
GeForce GTX 660
301.75 mInteraction/s

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus