Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Mobility Radeon HD 5650

Reasons to consider the
ATi Mobility Radeon HD 5650

Report a correction
Better PassMark score 541 vs 215 More than 2.5x better PassMark score
Slightly better floating-point performance 520 GFLOPS vs 48.96 GFLOPS More than 10.5x better floating-point performance
More shading units 400 vs 16 384 more shading units
Wider memory bus 128 bit vs 64 bit 2x wider memory bus
Slightly more texture mapping units 20 vs 8 12 more texture mapping units
Higher memory clock speed 800 MHz vs 667 MHz Around 20% higher memory clock speed
Front view of GeForce 310M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 310M

Report a correction

GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Nvidia GeForce 310M vs the ATi Mobility Radeon HD 5650.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Mobility Radeon HD 5650 vs GeForce 310M

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

Features Key features of the Mobility Radeon HD 5650  vs GeForce 310M 

memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory

GeForce 310M
10.67 GB/s

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

GeForce 310M
2.42 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

GeForce 310M
4.85 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

GeForce 310M
48.96 GFLOPS

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus