0 Comments
| Mobility Radeon HD 5650 vs GeForce GT 320M |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Higher clock speed | 650 MHz | vs | 500 MHz | 30% higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Better PassMark score | 541 | vs | 276 | More than 95% better PassMark score | |||
Slightly better floating-point performance | 520 GFLOPS | vs | 52.8 GFLOPS | More than 9.8x better floating-point performance | |||
More shading units | 400 | vs | 24 | 376 more shading units | |||
Slightly more texture mapping units | 20 | vs | 8 | 12 more texture mapping units | |||
| |||||||
GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Nvidia GeForce GT 320M vs the ATi Mobility Radeon HD 5650. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Mobility Radeon HD 5650 vs GeForce GT 320M
PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark
Features Key features of the Mobility Radeon HD 5650 vs GeForce GT 320M
memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory
Mobility Radeon HD 5650
25.6 GB/s
GeForce GT 320M
25.28 GB/s
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
Mobility Radeon HD 5650
5.2 GPixel/s
GeForce GT 320M
4 GPixel/s
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
Mobility Radeon HD 5650
13 GTexel/s
GeForce GT 320M
4 GTexel/s
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
Mobility Radeon HD 5650
520 GFLOPS
GeForce GT 320M
52.8 GFLOPS