Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Mobility Radeon HD 5650

Reasons to consider the
ATi Mobility Radeon HD 5650

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 650 MHz vs 500 MHz 30% higher clock speed
Better PassMark score 541 vs 276 More than 95% better PassMark score
Slightly better floating-point performance 520 GFLOPS vs 52.8 GFLOPS More than 9.8x better floating-point performance
More shading units 400 vs 24 376 more shading units
Slightly more texture mapping units 20 vs 8 12 more texture mapping units
Front view of GeForce GT 320M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 320M

Report a correction

GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Nvidia GeForce GT 320M vs the ATi Mobility Radeon HD 5650.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Mobility Radeon HD 5650 vs GeForce GT 320M

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

Features Key features of the Mobility Radeon HD 5650  vs GeForce GT 320M 

memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

GeForce GT 320M
4 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

GeForce GT 320M
4 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

GeForce GT 320M
52.8 GFLOPS

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

Comments

comments powered by Disqus