GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 5730 vs 525M among Laptop GPUs under 35W TDP

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan and Cloud Gate Factor

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 30 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 30 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

Winner
ATi Mobility Radeon HD 5730 

GPUBoss recommends the ATi Mobility Radeon HD 5730  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Mobility Radeon HD 5730

Reasons to consider the
ATi Mobility Radeon HD 5730

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 7,265 vs 799 More than 9x better 3DMark06 score
Better manhattan score 3,592.09 vs 2,921.39 Around 25% better manhattan score
More shading units 400 vs 96 304 more shading units
Slightly better particle simulation score 76.57 mInteraction/s vs 43.38 mInteraction/s More than 75% better particle simulation score
Front view of GeForce GT 525M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 525M

Report a correction
Higher memory clock speed 900 MHz vs 800 MHz Around 15% higher memory clock speed

Benchmarks Real world tests of Mobility Radeon HD 5730 vs GeForce GT 525M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Mobility Radeon HD 5730
48.76 mHash/s
GeForce GT 525M
14.79 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Mobility Radeon HD 5730
3.8 mPixels/s
GeForce GT 525M
5.1 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Mobility Radeon HD 5730
219.94 frames/s
GeForce GT 525M
179.45 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Mobility Radeon HD 5730
76.57 mInteraction/s
GeForce GT 525M
43.38 mInteraction/s

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus