Winner
ATi Mobility Radeon HD 5870
GPUBoss recommends the ATi Mobility Radeon HD 5870 based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details Mobility Radeon HD 5870 vs GeForce GT 425M |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 5870 vs 425M among Laptop GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 6.1 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
ATi Mobility Radeon HD 5870GPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much better 3DMark06 score | 12,830.5 | vs | 753 | More than 17x better 3DMark06 score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 12,830.5 | vs | 6,706.5 | More than 90% better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
| Better PassMark score | 1,223 | vs | 625 | More than 95% better PassMark score | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 4,000 MHz | vs | 1,600 MHz | 2.5x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Higher clock speed | 700 MHz | vs | 560 MHz | 25% higher clock speed | |||
| Better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 7,616 | vs | 2,789 | Around 2.8x better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
| Much better manhattan score | 3,719.68 | vs | 2,156.47 | More than 70% better manhattan score | |||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | vs | 25.6 GB/s | Around 2.5x higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 1,120 GFLOPS | vs | 215 GFLOPS | Around 5.2x better floating-point performance | |||
| More shading units | 800 | vs | 96 | 704 more shading units | |||
| Better ocean surface simulation score | 585.97 frames/s | vs | 161.58 frames/s | Around 3.8x better ocean surface simulation score | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 11.2 GPixel/s | vs | 2.24 GPixel/s | Around 5x higher pixel rate | |||
| Higher texture rate | 28 GTexel/s | vs | 8.96 GTexel/s | More than 3x higher texture rate | |||
| More render output processors | 16 | vs | 4 | 12 more render output processors | |||
| More texture mapping units | 40 | vs | 16 | 24 more texture mapping units | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,000 MHz | vs | 800 MHz | 25% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Slightly better sky diver factor score | 118.32 | vs | 64.35 | Around 85% better sky diver factor score | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 639 | vs | 301 | More than 2x better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| |||||||
| Lower TDP | 23W | vs | 50W | 2.2x lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
