Winner
ATi Mobility Radeon HD 5870
GPUBoss recommends the ATi Mobility Radeon HD 5870 based on its benchmarks.
See full details Mobility Radeon HD 5870 vs GeForce GTX 560M |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 5870 vs 560M among Laptop GPUs over 35W TDP
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 0.4 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 12,830.5 | vs | 1,820 | More than 7x better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 4,000 MHz | vs | 2,500 MHz | 60% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Slightly better floating-point performance | 1,120 GFLOPS | vs | 595.2 GFLOPS | Around 90% better floating-point performance | |||
| More shading units | 800 | vs | 192 | 608 more shading units | |||
| Significantly higher memory clock speed | 1,000 MHz | vs | 625 MHz | 60% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Better manhattan score | 3,719.68 | vs | 3,327.44 | More than 10% better manhattan score | |||
| Better ocean surface simulation score | 585.97 frames/s | vs | 404.62 frames/s | Around 45% better ocean surface simulation score | |||
| Lower TDP | 50W | vs | 75W | Around 35% lower TDP | |||
| |||||||
| Better 3DMark06 score | 15,327 | vs | 12,830.5 | Around 20% better 3DMark06 score | |||
| Better PassMark score | 1,554 | vs | 1,223 | More than 25% better PassMark score | |||
| Higher clock speed | 775 MHz | vs | 700 MHz | More than 10% higher clock speed | |||
| More render output processors | 24 | vs | 16 | 8 more render output processors | |||
| Wider memory bus | 192 bit | vs | 128 bit | 50% wider memory bus | |||
Report a correction
