Winner
ATi Mobility Radeon HD 5870
GPUBoss recommends the ATi Mobility Radeon HD 5870 based on its benchmarks.
See full details Mobility Radeon HD 5870 vs GeForce GTX 560M |
Released January, 2010
ATi Mobility Radeon HD 5870
- 700 MHz
- 1 GB GDDR5
7.1 Out of 10
by www.tweaktown.comCurrently I have an ASUS HD5870, and while it runs most games pretty decently, would like to explore high end single GPU options for gaming.
VS
Released May, 2011
Nvidia GeForce GTX 560M
- 775 MHz
- 1.5 GB GDDR5
6.7 Out of 10
by Jarred-Walton (Apr, 2013)As for the Boost clocks, in practice that can increase the GPU core speed 15% or more over the normal value, with most games realizing a 10-15% performance thanks to the increase.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 5870 vs 560M among Laptop GPUs over 35W TDP
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 7.1 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 12,830.5 | vs | 1,820 | More than 7x better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 4,000 MHz | vs | 2,500 MHz | 60% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 1,120 GFLOPS | vs | 595.2 GFLOPS | Around 90% better floating-point performance | |||
| More shading units | 800 | vs | 192 | 608 more shading units | |||
| Significantly higher memory clock speed | 1,000 MHz | vs | 625 MHz | 60% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Better ocean surface simulation score | 585.97 frames/s | vs | 404.62 frames/s | Around 45% better ocean surface simulation score | |||
| Slightly better manhattan score | 3,661.76 | vs | 3,379.02 | Around 10% better manhattan score | |||
| Lower TDP | 50W | vs | 75W | Around 35% lower TDP | |||
| |||||||
| Better 3DMark06 score | 15,327 | vs | 12,830.5 | Around 20% better 3DMark06 score | |||
| Higher clock speed | 775 MHz | vs | 700 MHz | More than 10% higher clock speed | |||
| Much better CLBenchmark raytrace score | 46,652 | vs | 30,649 | More than 50% better CLBenchmark raytrace score | |||
| More render output processors | 24 | vs | 16 | 8 more render output processors | |||
| Wider memory bus | 192 bit | vs | 128 bit | 50% wider memory bus | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Mobility Radeon HD 5870 vs GeForce GTX 560M
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $317 | ||
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs 1050 | ||
| | VS |  |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| $317 | ||
| GeForce GTX 1060 vs 970 | ||
| | VS |  |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
 | VS | |
| $317 | ||
| Radeon RX 580 vs GeForce GTX 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $317 | ||
| GeForce GTX 1060 vs 1070 | ||
