GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 610 vs R7 260 among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

7.2

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GT 610 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GT 610  based on its noise and power.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GT 610

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 610

Report a correction
Lower TDP 29W vs 95W 3.3x lower TDP
Front view of Radeon R7 260

Reasons to consider the
MSI Radeon R7 260

Report a correction
Much higher effective memory clock speed 6,000 MHz vs 1,796 MHz More than 3.2x higher effective memory clock speed
Higher clock speed 1,050 MHz vs 810 MHz Around 30% higher clock speed
Significantly higher memory bandwidth 96 GB/s vs 14.37 GB/s Around 6.8x higher memory bandwidth
Better floating-point performance 1,612.8 GFLOPS vs 155.52 GFLOPS More than 10.2x better floating-point performance
Higher texture rate 50.4 GTexel/s vs 6.48 GTexel/s More than 7.8x higher texture rate
Significantly better fire strike factor score 33.04 vs 3.22 More than 10.2x better fire strike factor score
Higher pixel rate 16.8 GPixel/s vs 1.62 GPixel/s More than 10.2x higher pixel rate
Much higher memory clock speed 1,500 MHz vs 898 MHz More than 65% higher memory clock speed
More shading units 768 vs 48 720 more shading units
More texture mapping units 48 vs 8 40 more texture mapping units
More render output processors 16 vs 4 12 more render output processors
Better face detection score 26.19 mPixels/s vs 2.47 mPixels/s More than 10.5x better face detection score
Wider memory bus 128 bit vs 64 bit 2x wider memory bus

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GT 610 vs Radeon R7 260

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GT 610
4.05 mHash/s
Radeon R7 260
240.4 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GT 610
2.47 mPixels/s
Radeon R7 260
26.19 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GT 610
79.36 frames/s
Radeon R7 260
798.24 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GT 610
22.74 mInteraction/s
Radeon R7 260
315.58 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GT 610
0.23 frames/s
Radeon R7 260
4.22 frames/s

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Comments

comments powered by Disqus