GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 650 Ti Boost vs 7770


Real world tests using the latest 3D games

crysis: warhead (2013), Crysis: Warhead (2012), Batman: Arkham City and 3 more


Synthetic tests to measure overall performance

PassMark, 3DMark Vantage Texture Fill, 3DMark 11 Graphics and 2 more

Compute Performance

General computing tests executed on the GPU

SmallLuxGPU 2.0d4, Civilization 5 Texture Decomposition (2013) and 3 more

Noise and Power

How loud and hot does the card run idle and under load

TDP, Idle Noise Level, Load Noise Level, Idle Power Consumption and 1 more

GPUBoss Score

Gaming, Benchmarks, Compute Performance and Noise and Power

Palit GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 

GPUBoss recommends the Palit GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost  based on its gaming and benchmarks.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

Reasons to consider the
Palit GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

Report a correction
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 21,830 vs 13,398 Around 65% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Better PassMark score 3,535 vs 2,157 Around 65% better PassMark score
Slightly better 3DMark vantage texture fill score 53.1 vs 36.8 Around 45% better 3DMark vantage texture fill score
Higher memory bandwidth 122.4 GB/s vs 80 GB/s Around 55% higher memory bandwidth
Higher texture rate 64.4 GTexel/s vs 44 GTexel/s More than 45% higher texture rate
Higher battlefield 3 framerate 73.6 fps vs 41.4 fps Around 80% higher battlefield 3 framerate
Better civilization 5 texture decomposition (2013) score 250.1 vs 215.8 More than 15% better civilization 5 texture decomposition (2013) score
Slightly more render output processors 24 vs 16 8 more render output processors
Slightly more texture mapping units 64 vs 40 24 more texture mapping units
Higher crysis: warhead framerate 34.5 fps vs 23 fps 50% higher crysis: warhead framerate
Higher batman: arkham city framerate 48 fps vs 36 fps Around 35% higher batman: arkham city framerate
Front view of Radeon HD 7770

Reasons to consider the
GIGABYTE Radeon HD 7770

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1,100 MHz vs 1,006 MHz Around 10% higher clock speed
Better 3DMark06 score 19,307 vs 17,060 Around 15% better 3DMark06 score
Quieter load noise level 41.4 dB vs 47.4 dB Around 15% quieter load noise level
More energy-efficient load power consumption 242W vs 289W More than 15% more energy-efficient load power consumption
Better SmallLuxGPU 2.0d4 score 9,600 vs 3,400 More than 2.8x better SmallLuxGPU 2.0d4 score
Quieter idle noise level 40 dB vs 40.8 dB Almost the same
Lower TDP 80W vs 134W More than 40% lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost OC 1 GB vs Radeon HD 7770

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

3DMark Vantage (Texture Fill) Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX performance

3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance

Crysis: Warhead (2013) 1920x1080 - Enthusiast Quality + 4xAA

Batman: Arkham City 1920x1200 - Extreme quality + FXAA-HIGH

SmallLux GPU 2.0d4 Measures compute performance using OpenCL to do 3D rendering

Reviews Word on the street

GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost OC 1 GB  vs Radeon HD 7770 

Gaming noise is much improved too, which should result in a really quiet gaming experience.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost


comments powered by Disqus