GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 650 Ti Boost vs 7770 among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

Winner
Palit GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 

GPUBoss recommends the Palit GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost  based on its gaming and benchmarks.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

Reasons to consider the
Palit GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark vantage texture fill score 53.1 vs 36.8 Around 45% better 3DMark vantage texture fill score
Significantly better 3DMark vantage graphics score 21,830 vs 13,398 Around 65% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 5,770 vs 3,098 More than 85% better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Higher memory bandwidth 122.4 GB/s vs 80 GB/s Around 55% higher memory bandwidth
Better T-Rex score 1.95 frames/s vs -1 frames/s Around 300% better T-Rex score
Slightly higher texture rate 64.4 GTexel/s vs 44 GTexel/s More than 45% higher texture rate
Higher battlefield 3 framerate 73.6 fps vs 41.4 fps Around 80% higher battlefield 3 framerate
More texture mapping units 64 vs 40 24 more texture mapping units
More render output processors 24 vs 16 8 more render output processors
Better civilization 5 texture decomposition (2013) score 250.1 vs 215.8 More than 15% better civilization 5 texture decomposition (2013) score
Higher crysis: warhead framerate 34.5 fps vs 23 fps 50% higher crysis: warhead framerate
Better sky diver factor score 253.99 vs 222.23 Around 15% better sky diver factor score
Front view of Radeon HD 7770

Reasons to consider the
GIGABYTE Radeon HD 7770

Report a correction
Much more energy-efficient load power consumption 242W vs 289W More than 15% more energy-efficient load power consumption
Much more energy-efficient idle power consumption 106W vs 110W Around 5% more energy-efficient idle power consumption
Better 3DMark06 score 19,307 vs 17,060 Around 15% better 3DMark06 score
Higher clock speed 1,100 MHz vs 1,006 MHz Around 10% higher clock speed
Lower TDP 80W vs 134W More than 40% lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost OC 1 GB vs Radeon HD 7770

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
48.29 mHash/s
Radeon HD 7770
156.35 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
20.46 mPixels/s
Radeon HD 7770
33.84 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 7770
595.87 frames/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Reviews Word on the street

GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost OC 1 GB  vs Radeon HD 7770 

9.6
8.7
Gaming noise is much improved too, which should result in a really quiet gaming experience.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

Comments

comments powered by Disqus