GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of M4000M vs 960M among Laptop GPUs over 35W TDP

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

7.8

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia Quadro M4000M 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia Quadro M4000M  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Quadro M4000M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia Quadro M4000M

Report a correction
Significantly higher pixel rate 62.4 GPixel/s vs 17.55 GPixel/s More than 3.5x higher pixel rate
More memory 4,096 MB vs 2,048 MB 2x more memory
Higher memory bandwidth 160.4 GB/s vs 80.2 GB/s 2x higher memory bandwidth
Many more render output processors 64 vs 16 48 more render output processors
Better floating-point performance 2,496 GFLOPS vs 1,404.2 GFLOPS Around 80% better floating-point performance
Higher texture rate 78 GTexel/s vs 43.9 GTexel/s Around 80% higher texture rate
Much higher bioshock infinite framerate 85 vs 45.05 Around 90% higher bioshock infinite framerate
More shading units 1,280 vs 640 Twice as many shading units
More texture mapping units 80 vs 40 Twice as many texture mapping units
Significantly wider memory bus 256 bit vs 128 bit 2x wider memory bus
Better bitcoin mining score 251.46 mHash/s vs 174.57 mHash/s Around 45% better bitcoin mining score
Front view of GeForce GTX 960M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1,097 MHz vs 975 MHz Around 15% higher clock speed
Lower TDP 75W vs 100W 25% lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of Quadro M4000M vs GeForce GTX 960M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Quadro M4000M
251.46 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 960M
174.57 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Quadro M4000M
81.1 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 960M
54.29 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Quadro M4000M
1,235.34 frames/s
GeForce GTX 960M
795.24 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Quadro M4000M
880.04 mInteraction/s
GeForce GTX 960M
578.1 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench

Quadro M4000M
6.16 frames/s
GeForce GTX 960M
3.69 frames/s

Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench

Quadro M4000M
68.44 frames/s
GeForce GTX 960M
51.97 frames/s

Bioshock Infinite

Comments

comments powered by Disqus