GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of M4000M vs K1200 among all GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

7.3

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia Quadro M4000M 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia Quadro M4000M  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Quadro M4000M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia Quadro M4000M

Report a correction
Significantly higher pixel rate 62.4 GPixel/s vs 16.93 GPixel/s Around 3.8x higher pixel rate
Higher memory bandwidth 160.4 GB/s vs 80 GB/s More than 2x higher memory bandwidth
Many more render output processors 64 vs 16 48 more render output processors
Better floating-point performance 2,496 GFLOPS vs 1,083.4 GFLOPS More than 2.2x better floating-point performance
Higher texture rate 78 GTexel/s vs 33.9 GTexel/s More than 2.2x higher texture rate
Better video composition score 68.44 frames/s vs 25.41 frames/s Around 2.8x better video composition score
More shading units 1,280 vs 512 768 more shading units
More texture mapping units 80 vs 32 48 more texture mapping units
Slightly wider memory bus 256 bit vs 128 bit 2x wider memory bus
Front view of Quadro K1200

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia Quadro K1200

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1,058 MHz vs 975 MHz Around 10% higher clock speed
Lower TDP 45W vs 100W 2.2x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of Quadro M4000M vs K1200

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Quadro M4000M
251.46 mHash/s
Quadro K1200
117.72 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Quadro M4000M
81.1 mPixels/s
Quadro K1200
31.95 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Quadro M4000M
1,235.34 frames/s
Quadro K1200
466.14 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Quadro M4000M
880.04 mInteraction/s
Quadro K1200
320.66 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench

Quadro M4000M
6.16 frames/s
Quadro K1200
2.63 frames/s

Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench

Quadro M4000M
68.44 frames/s
Quadro K1200
25.41 frames/s

Comments

comments powered by Disqus