Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon 3100 IGP

Reasons to consider the
ATi Radeon 3100 IGP

Report a correction

GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the ATi Radeon 3100 IGP vs the Nvidia GeForce 940M.

Front view of GeForce 940M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 940M

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 1,072 MHz vs 344 MHz More than 3x higher clock speed
Slightly better floating-point performance 823.3 GFLOPS vs 27.52 GFLOPS Around 30x better floating-point performance
Slightly higher texture rate 25.73 GTexel/s vs 1.38 GTexel/s Around 18.8x higher texture rate
More shading units 384 vs 40 344 more shading units
More texture mapping units 24 vs 4 20 more texture mapping units

Features Key features of the Radeon 3100 IGP  vs GeForce 940M 

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

Radeon 3100 IGP
1.38 GPixel/s
GeForce 940M
8.58 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

Radeon 3100 IGP
1.38 GTexel/s
GeForce 940M
25.73 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

Radeon 3100 IGP
27.52 GFLOPS
GeForce 940M
823.3 GFLOPS

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

render output processors GPU commponents responsible for transform pixels as they flow between memory buffers

Specifications Full list of technical specs


Radeon 3100 IGP  vs
GeForce 940M 
GPU brand ATi Nvidia
GPU name RS780C GM108
Clock speed 344 MHz 1,072 MHz
Is dual GPU No No
Reference card None Nvidia GeForce 940M 1 GHz 2 GB

raw performance

Radeon 3100 IGP  vs
GeForce 940M 
Shading units 40 384
Texture mapping units 4 24
Render output processors 4 8
Pixel rate 1.38 GPixel/s 8.58 GPixel/s
Texture rate 1.38 GTexel/s 25.73 GTexel/s
Floating-point performance 27.52 GFLOPS 823.3 GFLOPS


comments powered by Disqus