Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon 3100 IGP

Reasons to consider the
ATi Radeon 3100 IGP

Report a correction

GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the ATi Radeon 3100 IGP vs the Nvidia GeForce GT 9400.

Front view of GeForce GT 9400

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 9400

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 550 MHz vs 344 MHz Around 60% higher clock speed

Features Key features of the Radeon 3100 IGP  vs GeForce GT 9400 

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

Radeon 3100 IGP
1.38 GPixel/s
GeForce GT 9400
2.2 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

Radeon 3100 IGP
1.38 GTexel/s
GeForce GT 9400
4.4 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

Radeon 3100 IGP
27.52 GFLOPS
GeForce GT 9400

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

render output processors GPU commponents responsible for transform pixels as they flow between memory buffers

Specifications Full list of technical specs


Radeon 3100 IGP  vs
GeForce GT 9400 
GPU brand ATi Nvidia
GPU name RS780C G96 C1
Clock speed 344 MHz 550 MHz
Is dual GPU No No
Reference card None None

raw performance

Radeon 3100 IGP  vs
GeForce GT 9400 
Shading units 40 16
Texture mapping units 4 8
Render output processors 4 4
Pixel rate 1.38 GPixel/s 2.2 GPixel/s
Texture rate 1.38 GTexel/s 4.4 GTexel/s
Floating-point performance 27.52 GFLOPS 44.8 GFLOPS


comments powered by Disqus