Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon E4690 MXM

Reasons to consider the
ATi Radeon E4690 MXM

Report a correction
Slightly more shading units 320 vs 32 288 more shading units
Slightly lower TDP 30W vs 50W 40% lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GT 9500

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 9500

Report a correction
Slightly higher memory clock speed 800 MHz vs 700 MHz Around 15% higher memory clock speed

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon E4690 MXM vs GeForce GT 9500

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

Features Key features of the Radeon E4690 MXM  vs GeForce GT 9500 

memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory

Radeon E4690 MXM
22.4 GB/s
GeForce GT 9500
25.6 GB/s

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

Radeon E4690 MXM
4.8 GPixel/s
GeForce GT 9500
4.4 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

Radeon E4690 MXM
19.2 GTexel/s
GeForce GT 9500
8.8 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

Radeon E4690 MXM
384 GFLOPS
GeForce GT 9500
89.6 GFLOPS

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

Comments

comments powered by Disqus