Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon E8950

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon E8950

Report a correction
More memory 8,192 MB vs 6,144 MB Around 35% more memory
Higher memory bandwidth 192 GB/s vs 120.3 GB/s Around 60% higher memory bandwidth
Higher effective memory clock speed 6,000 MHz vs 5,012 MHz Around 20% higher effective memory clock speed
More shading units 2,048 vs 1,280 768 more shading units
More texture mapping units 128 vs 80 48 more texture mapping units
Wider memory bus 256 bit vs 192 bit Around 35% wider memory bus
Higher memory clock speed 1,500 MHz vs 1,253 MHz Around 20% higher memory clock speed
Better face detection score 66.84 mPixels/s vs 59.43 mPixels/s More than 10% better face detection score
Front view of GeForce GTX 970M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970M

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 1,038 MHz vs 735 MHz More than 40% higher clock speed
Higher pixel rate 49.8 GPixel/s vs 23.52 GPixel/s More than 2x higher pixel rate
More render output processors 48 vs 32 16 more render output processors

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon E8950 vs GeForce GTX 970M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon E8950
326.39 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 970M
313.57 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon E8950
66.84 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 970M
59.43 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon E8950
1,369.72 frames/s
GeForce GTX 970M
1,113.79 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon E8950
510.69 mInteraction/s
GeForce GTX 970M
607.23 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon E8950
6.63 frames/s
GeForce GTX 970M
4.16 frames/s

Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon E8950
65.84 frames/s
GeForce GTX 970M
83.51 frames/s


comments powered by Disqus