Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon E8950

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon E8950

Report a correction
Higher effective memory clock speed 6,000 MHz vs 5,012 MHz Around 20% higher effective memory clock speed
Higher memory bandwidth 192 GB/s vs 160.4 GB/s Around 20% higher memory bandwidth
More shading units 2,048 vs 1,536 512 more shading units
More texture mapping units 128 vs 96 32 more texture mapping units
Higher memory clock speed 1,500 MHz vs 1,253 MHz Around 20% higher memory clock speed
Better ocean surface simulation score 1,369.72 frames/s vs 1,146.53 frames/s Around 20% better ocean surface simulation score
Front view of GeForce GTX 980M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 980M

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 1,038 MHz vs 735 MHz More than 40% higher clock speed
Significantly higher pixel rate 66.4 GPixel/s vs 23.52 GPixel/s More than 2.8x higher pixel rate
Significantly more render output processors 64 vs 32 Twice as many render output processors

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon E8950 vs GeForce GTX 980M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon E8950
326.39 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 980M
384.62 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon E8950
66.84 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 980M
92.63 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon E8950
1,369.72 frames/s
GeForce GTX 980M
1,146.53 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon E8950
510.69 mInteraction/s
GeForce GTX 980M
866.36 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon E8950
6.63 frames/s
GeForce GTX 980M
7.31 frames/s

Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon E8950
65.84 frames/s
GeForce GTX 980M
89.43 frames/s


comments powered by Disqus