0 Comments
| Radeon E9260 PCIe vs GeForce GT 1030 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
More memory | 4,096 MB | vs | 2,048 MB | 2x more memory | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Higher memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | vs | 48.06 GB/s | More than 2.2x higher memory bandwidth | |||
Higher effective memory clock speed | 7,000 MHz | vs | 6,008 MHz | More than 15% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
Better floating-point performance | 2,150.4 GFLOPS | vs | 1,127 GFLOPS | More than 90% better floating-point performance | |||
More shading units | 896 | vs | 384 | 512 more shading units | |||
More texture mapping units | 48 | vs | 24 | Twice as many texture mapping units | |||
More render output processors | 16 | vs | 8 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
Higher memory clock speed | 1,750 MHz | vs | 1,502 MHz | More than 15% higher memory clock speed | |||
| |||||||
Higher clock speed | 1,227 MHz | vs | 1,090 MHz | Around 15% higher clock speed | |||
Higher turbo clock speed | 1,468 MHz | vs | 1,200 MHz | More than 20% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Lower TDP | 30W | vs | 80W | 2.7x lower TDP |
Features Key features of the Radeon E9260 PCIe vs GeForce GT 1030
memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory
Radeon E9260 PCIe
112 GB/s
GeForce GT 1030
48.06 GB/s
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
Radeon E9260 PCIe
19.2 GPixel/s
GeForce GT 1030
11.74 GPixel/s
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
Radeon E9260 PCIe
57.6 GTexel/s
GeForce GT 1030
35.23 GTexel/s
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
Radeon E9260 PCIe
2,150.4 GFLOPS
GeForce GT 1030
1,127 GFLOPS
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
GeForce GT 1030
384
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
Specifications Full list of technical specs
gpu | Radeon E9260 PCIe | vs | GeForce GT 1030 |
---|---|---|---|
GPU brand | AMD | Nvidia | |
GPU name | Baffin | GP108 | |
Clock speed | 1,090 MHz | 1,227 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 1,200 MHz | 1,468 MHz | |
Is dual GPU | No | No | |
Reference card | None | None | |
raw performance | |||
Shading units | 896 | 384 | |
Texture mapping units | 48 | 24 | |
Render output processors | 16 | 8 | |
Pixel rate | 19.2 GPixel/s | 11.74 GPixel/s | |
Texture rate | 57.6 GTexel/s | 35.23 GTexel/s | |
Floating-point performance | 2,150.4 GFLOPS | 1,127 GFLOPS |
memory | Radeon E9260 PCIe | vs | GeForce GT 1030 |
---|---|---|---|
Memory clock speed | 1,750 MHz | 1,502 MHz | |
Effective memory clock speed | 7,000 MHz | 6,008 MHz | |
Memory bus | 128 bit | 64 bit | |
Memory | 4,096 MB | 2,048 MB | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 | |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 48.06 GB/s | |
noise and power | |||
TDP | 80W | 30W |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1030 vs RX 550 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$98 | ||
1030 vs 730 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
1030 vs 750 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1030 vs 710 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | ||
1030 vs 660 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1030 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1030 vs 1050 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$267 | ||
1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$267 | ||
970 vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$267 | ||
1060 vs RX 580 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs R9 390 | ||