Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon HD 2400

Reasons to consider the
ATi Radeon HD 2400

Report a correction

GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the ATi Radeon HD 2400 vs the Nvidia GeForce 9400M.

Front view of GeForce 9400M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 9400M

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 580 MHz vs 398 MHz More than 45% higher clock speed

Features Key features of the Radeon HD 2400  vs GeForce 9400M 

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

Radeon HD 2400
1.59 GPixel/s
GeForce 9400M
2.32 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

Radeon HD 2400
1.59 GTexel/s
GeForce 9400M
4.64 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

Radeon HD 2400
31.84 GFLOPS
GeForce 9400M

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

render output processors GPU commponents responsible for transform pixels as they flow between memory buffers

Specifications Full list of technical specs


Radeon HD 2400  vs
GeForce 9400M 
GPU brand ATI Nvidia
GPU name RV610 C79MX
Clock speed 398 MHz 580 MHz
Is dual GPU No No
Reference card None None

noise and power

TDP 20W 12W

raw performance

Radeon HD 2400  vs
GeForce 9400M 
Shading units 40 16
Texture mapping units 4 8
Render output processors 4 4
Pixel rate 1.59 GPixel/s 2.32 GPixel/s
Texture rate 1.59 GTexel/s 4.64 GTexel/s
Floating-point performance 31.84 GFLOPS 44.8 GFLOPS


comments powered by Disqus