GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 2400 vs 320M


Real world tests using the latest 3D games

BioShock Infinite, Crysis 3, Dead Space 3, Diablo III and 1 more


Synthetic tests to measure overall performance


Compute Performance

General computing tests executed on the GPU

PassMark Direct Compute and CLBenchmark Raytrace

No winner declared

We don't have enough data yet to properly compare these products

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon HD 2400

Reasons to consider the
ATi Radeon HD 2400

Report a correction

GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the ATi Radeon HD 2400 vs the Nvidia GeForce GT 320M.

Front view of GeForce GT 320M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 320M

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 500 MHz vs 398 MHz More than 25% higher clock speed
Higher effective memory clock speed 1,580 MHz vs 990 MHz Around 60% higher effective memory clock speed
Better T-Rex score 1,741.94 vs 864.15 More than 2x better T-Rex score
Higher memory clock speed 790 MHz vs 495 MHz Around 60% higher memory clock speed

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon HD 2400 vs GeForce GT 320M

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench


comments powered by Disqus