Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon HD 2400

Reasons to consider the
ATi Radeon HD 2400

Report a correction
Lower TDP 20W vs 50W 2.5x lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GT 9500

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 9500

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 550 MHz vs 398 MHz Around 40% higher clock speed
Higher effective memory clock speed 1,600 MHz vs 990 MHz More than 60% higher effective memory clock speed
Higher memory bandwidth 25.6 GB/s vs 7.92 GB/s Around 3.2x higher memory bandwidth
Higher memory clock speed 800 MHz vs 495 MHz More than 60% higher memory clock speed
Wider memory bus 128 bit vs 64 bit 2x wider memory bus
Slightly more texture mapping units 16 vs 4 12 more texture mapping units

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon HD 2400 vs GeForce GT 9500

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

Features Key features of the Radeon HD 2400  vs GeForce GT 9500 

memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory

Radeon HD 2400
7.92 GB/s
GeForce GT 9500
25.6 GB/s

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

Radeon HD 2400
1.59 GPixel/s
GeForce GT 9500
4.4 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

Radeon HD 2400
1.59 GTexel/s
GeForce GT 9500
8.8 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

Radeon HD 2400
31.84 GFLOPS
GeForce GT 9500
89.6 GFLOPS

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

Comments

comments powered by Disqus