Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac vs GeForce GT 120 Mac |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 700 MHz | vs | 550 MHz | More than 25% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
| Slightly more render output processors | 8 | vs | 4 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
| Slightly more texture mapping units | 16 | vs | 8 | Twice as many texture mapping units | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac vs GeForce GT 120 Mac
memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
Specifications Full list of technical specs
gpu | Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac | vs | GeForce GT 120 Mac |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPU brand | ATI | Nvidia | |
| GPU name | RV630 | G96 C1 | |
| Market | Desktop | Desktop | |
| Clock speed | 700 MHz | 550 MHz | |
| Is dual GPU | No | No | |
| Reference card | None | None | |
raw performance | |||
| Shading units | 120 | 32 | |
| Texture mapping units | 8 | 16 | |
| Render output processors | 4 | 8 | |
| Pixel rate | 2.8 GPixel/s | 4.4 GPixel/s | |
| Texture rate | 5.6 GTexel/s | 8.8 GTexel/s | |
| Floating-point performance | 168 GFLOPS | 89.6 GFLOPS | |
memory | Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac | vs | GeForce GT 120 Mac |
|---|---|---|---|
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 800 MHz | |
| Effective memory clock speed | 1,600 MHz | 1,600 MHz | |
| Memory bus | 128 bit | 128 bit | |
| Memory | 256 MB | 512 MB | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 | |
| Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s | |
noise and power | |||
| TDP | 45W | 50W | |
