Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon HD 3300 IGP

Reasons to consider the
ATi Radeon HD 3300 IGP

Report a correction

GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the ATi Radeon HD 3300 IGP vs the Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS.

Front view of GeForce 8400 GS

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS

Report a correction
Slightly higher clock speed 520 MHz vs 494 MHz More than 5% higher clock speed

Features Key features of the Radeon HD 3300 IGP  vs GeForce 8400 GS 

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

Radeon HD 3300 IGP
1.98 GPixel/s
GeForce 8400 GS
2.08 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

Radeon HD 3300 IGP
1.98 GTexel/s
GeForce 8400 GS
4.16 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

Radeon HD 3300 IGP
39.52 GFLOPS
GeForce 8400 GS
39.36 GFLOPS

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

render output processors GPU commponents responsible for transform pixels as they flow between memory buffers

Specifications Full list of technical specs


Radeon HD 3300 IGP  vs
GeForce 8400 GS 
GPU brand ATi Nvidia
GPU name RS780D GT218 B1
Clock speed 494 MHz 520 MHz
Is dual GPU No No
Reference card None None

raw performance

Radeon HD 3300 IGP  vs
GeForce 8400 GS 
Shading units 40 16
Texture mapping units 4 8
Render output processors 4 4
Pixel rate 1.98 GPixel/s 2.08 GPixel/s
Texture rate 1.98 GTexel/s 4.16 GTexel/s
Floating-point performance 39.52 GFLOPS 39.36 GFLOPS


comments powered by Disqus