Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon HD 4200 IGP

Reasons to consider the
ATI Radeon HD 4200 IGP

Report a correction

GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the ATI Radeon HD 4200 IGP vs the ASUS GeForce GT 8800.

Front view of GeForce GT 8800

Reasons to consider the
ASUS GeForce GT 8800

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 700 MHz vs 498 MHz More than 40% higher clock speed
Higher texture rate 39.2 GTexel/s vs 1.99 GTexel/s Around 19.8x higher texture rate
More texture mapping units 56 vs 4 52 more texture mapping units
Higher pixel rate 11.2 GPixel/s vs 1.99 GPixel/s Around 5.8x higher pixel rate
More render output processors 16 vs 4 12 more render output processors

Features Key features of the Radeon HD 4200 IGP  vs GeForce GT 8800 

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

Radeon HD 4200 IGP
1.99 GPixel/s
GeForce GT 8800
11.2 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

Radeon HD 4200 IGP
1.99 GTexel/s
GeForce GT 8800
39.2 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

Radeon HD 4200 IGP
39.84 GFLOPS
GeForce GT 8800

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

render output processors GPU commponents responsible for transform pixels as they flow between memory buffers

Specifications Full list of technical specs


Radeon HD 4200 IGP  vs
GeForce GT 8800 
GPU brand ATi Nvidia
GPU name RS880 G92
Clock speed 498 MHz 700 MHz
Is dual GPU No No
Reference card None Nvidia GeForce GT 8800 GT 600 MHz 512 MB

raw performance

Radeon HD 4200 IGP  vs
GeForce GT 8800 
Shading units 40 112
Texture mapping units 4 56
Render output processors 4 16
Pixel rate 1.99 GPixel/s 11.2 GPixel/s
Texture rate 1.99 GTexel/s 39.2 GTexel/s
Floating-point performance 39.84 GFLOPS 392 GFLOPS


comments powered by Disqus