Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon HD 4200 IGP

Reasons to consider the
ATI Radeon HD 4200 IGP

Report a correction

GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the ATI Radeon HD 4200 IGP vs the ATi Mobility Radeon HD 3850 X2.

Front view of Mobility Radeon HD 3850 X2

Reasons to consider the
ATi Mobility Radeon HD 3850 X2

Report a correction
Is dual GPU Yes vs No About half of graphics cards are dual GPU
Higher clock speed 580 MHz vs 498 MHz More than 15% higher clock speed
Significantly more render output processors 32 vs 4 28 more render output processors
Higher pixel rate 18.56 GPixel/s vs 1.99 GPixel/s More than 9.2x higher pixel rate
More shading units 640 vs 40 600 more shading units
More texture mapping units 32 vs 4 28 more texture mapping units
More compute units 8 vs 2 6 more compute units

Features Key features of the Radeon HD 4200 IGP  vs Mobility Radeon HD 3850 X2 

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

Radeon HD 4200 IGP
1.99 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

Radeon HD 4200 IGP
1.99 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

compute units Discrete cores within the GPU

Specifications Full list of technical specs

gpu

Radeon HD 4200 IGP  vs
Mobility Radeon HD 3850 X2 
GPU brand ATi ATI
GPU name RS880 M88
Clock speed 498 MHz 580 MHz
Is dual GPU No Yes
Reference card None None

raw performance

Radeon HD 4200 IGP  vs
Mobility Radeon HD 3850 X2 
Shading units 40 640
Texture mapping units 4 32
Render output processors 4 32
Compute units 2 8
Pixel rate 1.99 GPixel/s 18.56 GPixel/s
Texture rate 1.99 GTexel/s 18.56 GTexel/s
Floating-point performance 39.84 GFLOPS 742.4 GFLOPS

Comments

comments powered by Disqus