Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon HD 4200 IGP

Reasons to consider the
ATI Radeon HD 4200 IGP

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 498 MHz vs 344 MHz Around 45% higher clock speed
Front view of Radeon 3000 IGP

Reasons to consider the
ATi Radeon 3000 IGP

Report a correction

GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the ATi Radeon 3000 IGP vs the ATI Radeon HD 4200 IGP.

Features Key features of the Radeon HD 4200 IGP  vs 3000 IGP 

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

Radeon HD 4200 IGP
1.99 GPixel/s
Radeon 3000 IGP
1.38 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

Radeon HD 4200 IGP
1.99 GTexel/s
Radeon 3000 IGP
1.38 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

Radeon HD 4200 IGP
39.84 GFLOPS
Radeon 3000 IGP
27.52 GFLOPS

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

compute units Discrete cores within the GPU

Specifications Full list of technical specs

gpu

Radeon HD 4200 IGP  vs
3000 IGP 
GPU brand ATi ATi
GPU name RS880 RS780L
Clock speed 498 MHz 344 MHz
Is dual GPU No No
Reference card None None

raw performance

Radeon HD 4200 IGP  vs
3000 IGP 
Shading units 40 40
Texture mapping units 4 4
Render output processors 4 4
Compute units 2 2
Pixel rate 1.99 GPixel/s 1.38 GPixel/s
Texture rate 1.99 GTexel/s 1.38 GTexel/s
Floating-point performance 39.84 GFLOPS 27.52 GFLOPS

Comments

comments powered by Disqus