Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon HD 4250 IGP

Reasons to consider the
ATi Radeon HD 4250 IGP

Report a correction

GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the ATi Radeon HD 4250 IGP vs the Nvidia GeForce 830M.

Front view of GeForce 830M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 830M

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 1,082 MHz vs 498 MHz Around 2.2x higher clock speed

Features Key features of the Radeon HD 4250 IGP  vs GeForce 830M 

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

Radeon HD 4250 IGP
1.99 GPixel/s
GeForce 830M
8.66 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

Radeon HD 4250 IGP
1.99 GTexel/s
GeForce 830M
17.31 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

Radeon HD 4250 IGP
39.84 GFLOPS
GeForce 830M

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

render output processors GPU commponents responsible for transform pixels as they flow between memory buffers

Specifications Full list of technical specs


Radeon HD 4250 IGP  vs
GeForce 830M 
GPU brand ATi Nvidia
GPU name RS880 GM108
Clock speed 498 MHz 1,082 MHz
Is dual GPU No No
Reference card None None

raw performance

Radeon HD 4250 IGP  vs
GeForce 830M 
Shading units 40 256
Texture mapping units 4 16
Render output processors 4 8
Pixel rate 1.99 GPixel/s 8.66 GPixel/s
Texture rate 1.99 GTexel/s 17.31 GTexel/s
Floating-point performance 39.84 GFLOPS 554 GFLOPS


comments powered by Disqus